THE HAPPY CHILD EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,KARNAL vs. CIT(E), CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, in the interest of justice, decided to grant the assessee one more opportunity to be heard. The matter was restored to the CIT(Exemptions) for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee society applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application due to non-compliance with notices and questionnaires, despite multiple opportunities. The assessee claimed non-receipt of notices.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of the 12AA registration application was justified given the assessee's claim of non-receipt of notices and the tribunal's discretion to grant a further opportunity.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘H’, NEW DELHI
Before: SH. SAKTIJIT DEY & SH. N. K. BILLAIYA
PER N. K. BILLAIYA, AM:
This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the CIT(Exemptions), Chandigarh dated 22.04.2019 framed u/s.12AA (1)(b) (ii) of the Act.
The grievance of the assessee read as under:-
1) That the order passed by Ld CIT(Exemptions) is illegal, arbitrary has been passed in a Haste and has ignored basic aspects and facts of the case.
2) That the Notice issued by CIT (Exemptions) is only on the income tax portal. Due to Non receipt of any notice, appellant was not able to reply in respect of notice.
3) That the Ld CIT (Exemptions) has issued notice for further demanded same documents on the income tax portal which is already submitted by appellant at the time of registration u/s 12AA of Income Tax Act, 1961 on the basic of non produce the required document rejection of 12AA is illegal and unjustified.
4) That the order of the Ld CIT (Exemptions) under section 12AA(l)(b)(ii)of the Income Tax Act, 1961 deny to register the educational institution under the Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act,1961 so far as it is against the appellant, is opposed to law, probabilities facts and circumstances of the case.
5) That the appellant craves to add, delete, concede, and modify any or all the grounds of appeal at the time of hearing of appeal.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee inspite of several notices we decided to proceed exparte.
On receiving application in form No.10A the CIT(Exemptions), Chandigarh issued a questionnaire electronically none responded to the questionnaire. The CIT(Exemptions) further gave opportunity and again there was no compliance. The CIT(Exemptions) was left with no choice but to reject the application.
We are of the considered view that the assessee should get one more opportunity of being heard so that it can justify its claim of registration u/s.12AA of the Act.
Therefore, in the interest of justice and fair play we restore this issue to the files of the CIT(Exemptions), Chandigarh. The CIT (Exemptions) is directed to afford one more opportunity to the assessee and the assessee is directed to attend the proceedings. The appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purpose.
Decision announced in the open court on 15.06.2023
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- Vandemataram Projects Private Limited vs. Raipur Development AuthorityChhattisgarh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026