URJA KARMCHARI SAKH ALP BACHAT SAHKARITA MARYADIT,SAGAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGALORE, BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1/JAB/2022Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur06 December 2022AY 2018-20191 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal has corrected a minor typographical error in the date of hearing of the appeal. The substantive decision of the appeal, which was pronounced on 29/11/2022, remains unchanged.

What were the facts?

This is a corrigendum to an ITAT judgment. It corrects a typographical error in the date of hearing from '14/11/2022' to '15/11/2022'. The original appeal was between Urja Karmchari Sakh Alp Bachat Sahkarita Maryadit and the ITO, Ward-2, Sagar for the assessment year 2018-19.

What were the issues?

The primary issue addressed is the correction of a factual error in the record of the Tribunal's proceedings.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

The order in the captioned appeal was pronounced by the Tribunal on 29/11/2022. However, it is subsequently discovered that there has occurred a typographical error in writing the date of hearing. The same be read as “15/11/2022” instead of „14/11/2022‟.

Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay Arora) (Manomohan Das) Accountant Member Judicial Member Date: 06/12/2022 vr/- Copy to:

1. 1. The Appellant: Urja Karmchari Sakh Alp Bachat Sahkarita Maryadit, 117, Makroniya Sadbhawna Nagar, Sagar.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →