SANJIV CHAMANLAL AURORA,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PUNE

ITA 965/PUN/2017Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 May 2021AY 2013-143 pages

AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal permitted the withdrawal of the appeals as the assessees had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessees had filed appeals before the ITAT for various assessment years. They subsequently opted for resolution under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, PUNE

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY

For Appellant: Shri Abhay A. Avchat, Shri Vikas Agarwal, Shri Rohit Tapadiya

For Respondent: Shri S.P Walimbe

Hearing: 25.05.2021Pronounced: 25.05.2021

आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, // True Copy // धनजी सधचव / Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अधधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.

Date 1 Draft dictated on 25.05.2021 Sr.PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 25.05.2021 Sr.PS/PS 3 Draft proposed and placed JM/AM before the second Member 4 Draft discussed/approved by AM/JM second Member 5 Approved draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of order Sr.PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr.PS/PS 9 Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R 11 Date of dispatch of order

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →