SHRI MANENDRAJEET SINGH BHATIA,PATHALGAON,RAIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, RAIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(Appeal). At the time of hearing, the assessee's authorized representative sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal filed before the tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI RAVISH SOOD & SHRI JAMLAPPA D BATTULL
आदेश / ORDER
PER RAVISH SOOD, JM:
The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(Appeal), Bilaspur dated 24.03.2017, which in turn arises from the order passed by the A.O u/s.143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’), dated 13.03.2015 for assessment year 2012-13.
At the very outset of hearing, it was submitted by the Ld. Authorized Representative (for short ‘AR’) for the assessee that as per instructions he seeks to withdraw the present appeal.
Per contra, the Ld. Departmental Representative (for short ‘DR’) did not raise any objection for seeking withdrawal of the present appeal by the assessee.
In the backdrop of the aforesaid concession of the Ld. AR, we, herein, permit the assessee to withdraw the captioned appeal.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. 5.
Order pronounced in open court on 11th day of March 2022.
Sd/- Sd/- JAMLAPPA D BATTULL RAVISH SOOD ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER रायपुर/ RAIPUR ; �दनांक / Dated : 11th March, 2022 SB
3 Shri Manendrajeet Singh Bhatia Vs. ITO
आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant. 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent.
3. The CIT(Appeal), Bilaspur(C.G) 4. The Pr. CIT, Bilaspur (C.G) 5.�वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण,रायपुर ब�च, रायपुर / DR, ITAT, Raipur Bench, Raipur. गाड� फ़ाइल / Guard File. 6. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, // True Copy // �नजी स�चव / Private Secretary आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, रायपुर / ITAT, Raipur.
4 Shri Manendrajeet Singh Bhatia Vs. ITO
Date 1 Draft dictated on 11.03.2022 Sr.PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 11.03.2022 Sr.PS/PS 3 Draft proposed and placed JM/AM before the second Member 4 Draft discussed/approved by AM/JM second Member 5 Approved draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of order Sr.PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr.PS/PS 9 Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R 11 Date of dispatch of order
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026