M/S. MAHALAXMI DISTRIBUTORS,SANGLI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1, SANGLI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that all assessees wished to withdraw their appeals as they had filed applications under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The Revenue had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
Nine appeals were filed by different assessees for various assessment years. All assessees requested to withdraw their appeals.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessees opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI
आदेश / ORDER
These nine appeals by different assessees for the different assessment years mentioned in the caption are directed against the orders of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
We find that all the assessees wish to withdraw the appeals in view of having filed applications under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme proof of which the Form No. 3 is enclosed before this Tribunal.
The ld. DR has no objection in case all the assessees wish to withdraw the appeals.
In view of the request made by the assessees all the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 01st July, 2021.
Sd/- Sd/- (R.S. Syal) (S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER ऩुणे / Pune; ददन ांक / Dated : 01st July, 2021. RK आदेश की प्रतिलऱपप अग्रेपिि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अऩीऱ थी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यथी / The Respondent. 2. आयकर आयुक्त (अऩीऱ) / The CIT(A) concerned 3. आयकर आयुक्त / The CIT concerned 4. विभ गीय प्रतततनधध, आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, “ए” बेंच, 5. ऩुणे / DR, ITAT, “A” Bench, Pune. ग र्ड फ़ इऱ / Guard File. 6. //सत्य वऩत प्रतत// True Copy// आदेश नुस र / BY ORDER,
तनजी सधचि / Private Secretary, आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, ऩुणे / ITAT, Pune
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026