PRATHAMIK SHIKSHAK SAHAKARI BANK LTD.,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2678/PUN/2016Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 August 2021AY 2010-113 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to claim set off of brought forward losses. The AO was directed to verify the facts and allow proper set off after providing an opportunity of hearing.

What were the facts?

The assessee claimed set off of brought forward losses, but the Assessing Officer (AO) restricted the amount. The assessee argued that due to availing the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme for an earlier year, the losses should be allowed for set off in the current year.

What were the issues?

Whether brought forward losses are eligible for set off in the current assessment year after the assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme in an earlier year.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 9(1),Section 9(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, PUNE

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
For Respondent: Shri Vitthal Bhosale

आदेश / ORDER

PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM :

1.

This appeal by the assessee against the order dated 06-10-2016 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Kolhapur [„CIT(A)‟] for assessment year 2010-11.

2.

The assessee has raised the following additional ground. “On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the lower authorities have erred in not allowing the set off of brought forward losses for the sum of Rs.42,20,038/-, especially in view of the fact that appellant society has filed the declaration under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for Assessment Year 2008-09, and accepted the assessed income and paid taxes thereon and therefore as provisions of Section 9(1) and (2) of DTVSV Act, 2020 and as per answer to Q. No. 53 from FAQ issued in this respect, your appellant is entitled to claim the same, your appellant prays accordingly.”

3.

This being a legal ground, going to the root of the matter and not requiring any fresh factual examination, is admitted for hearing and disposal.

4.

In the year under consideration i.e. A.Y. 2010-11, the assessee claimed allowance of set off of brought forward losses to an extent of Rs.1,84,14,284/-. The AO restricted the amount of set off to Rs.42,20,038/-. The ld. AR submits that the lower authorities below did not give the proper set off of brought forward losses. He submits that the said losses were carried forward from the earlier years including A.Y. 2008- 09, in which it availed Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and paid taxes on the assessed income. The ld. AR argued that the assessee availed the option under clause (i) of sub-section (1) of section 9 of Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme Act, 2020. In view of the fact that the assessee has availed the option as stated above and claimed to have paid tax on the amount of income without adjustment of brought forward loss, such loss would become entitled for set off in the subsequent years including year under consideration. The AO is directed to verify the factual scenario in this regard and allow proper set off of the brought forward loss against the income for the current year after allowing opportunity of hearing to the assessee. No other ground was pressed by the ld. AR.

5.

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.

Order pronounced in the open court on 06th August, 2021.

Sd/- Sd/- (R.S. Syal) (S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER ऩुणे / Pune; ददनाांक / Dated : 06th August, 2021. RK आदेश की प्रनिलऱपप अग्रेपषि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अऩीऱाथी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यथी / The Respondent. 2. 3. The CIT(A)-2, Kolhapur 4. The Pr. CIT-II, Kolhapur ववभागीय प्रतततनधध, आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, “बी” बेंच, 5. ऩुणे / DR, ITAT, “B” Bench, Pune. गार्ड फ़ाइऱ / Guard File. 6. //सत्यावऩत प्रतत// True Copy// आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER,

तनजी सधचव / Private Secretary, आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, ऩुणे / ITAT, Pune

More judgments on Section 9(1)

All 168 judgments and leading authorities on Section 9(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →