JCIT (OSD) CENTRAL CIRCLE-I, NOIDA vs. MINAR HOTELS PVT LTD, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that a notice under Section 153C is invalid ab initio if there is no satisfaction note and no incriminating seized material. The assessment framed under this section was therefore quashed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed an order concerning assessment year 2012-13. The core issue was the validity of an assessment made under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act without any incriminating material seized during a search.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether an assessment under Section 153C can be valid without seized incriminating material and proper satisfaction recording by the Assessing Officer.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’, NEW DELHI
Before: Dr. B. R. R. KumarSh. Yogesh Kumar US
ORDER
Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:
The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order of ld. CIT(A)-IV, Kanpur dated 04.01.2019.
The only issue to be adjudicated by us is whether the assessment can be held to be valid in the absence of any material found and seized during the search.
Heard the arguments of both the parties and perused the material available on record.
It is a settled position of law that notice u/s 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is invalid ab-initio in absence of satisfaction note and incriminating seized material. From the plain reading of language of Section 153C of the Act and various
Minar Hotels Pvt. Ltd. judicial pronouncements, it is clear that in order to reopen the assessment of other person u/s 153C of the Act for the Assessment Year earlier to the year of search, direct correlation must exist between existence of incriminating material and relevant Assessment Years.
In the instant case, admittedly, additions are not based on any incriminating document found and seized as a result of search. In fact, no seized or incriminating document is mentioned in the satisfaction recorded by Assessing Officer for the Assessment Year involved in the appeal. Further, the AO has not recorded the satisfaction for these relevant Assessment Year as envisaged u/s 153C of the Act.
In view of these facts and respectfully following the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sinhgad Technical Educational Society, it is concluded that notice u/s 153C issued by the AO need to be treated as invalid and legally not sustainable and quashed, resulting in quashing of the assessment thus framed.
In the result, the assessment framed u/s 153C is void ab initio and hence the appeal of the revenue is liable to be dismissed.
Minar Hotels Pvt. Ltd. 8. In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 28/06/2023.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026