J & K WOMENS CORPORATION LIMITED,JAMMU vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee's activities, including skill development and women's empowerment, fall under the definition of charitable purposes as per Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal also referred to CBDT Circular No. 11/2008 and relevant case law supporting the assessee's claim.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a corporation established by the Jammu & Kashmir Government, applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT (Exemptions) rejected the application, stating that skill development is not education and implementing government welfare schemes with government funds is not charity.
What were the issues?
Whether skill development activities and implementation of government welfare schemes by a state-established corporation constitute charitable purposes for registration under Section 12AA. Whether the CIT (Exemptions) correctly interpreted the scope of 'education' and 'charitable purposes' under Section 2(15).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust v. CIT323 citing101 ITR 234 · 1975 · SC · Read judgment
- Gujarat State Co-operative Union v. CIT58 citing195 ITR 279 · 1992 · HC
- CIT, Kottayam v. Annandan Trust5 citing96 Taxmann.com 207 · 2018 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR.
Before: DR. M. L. MEENA & SH. ANIKESH BANERJEE
Per:Anikesh Banerjee, JM The instant appeal of the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) Chandigarh,[in brevity the ‘CIT (E)’]
order passed u/s 12AA (1) (b) (ii) of the Income Tax Act 1961[in brevity ‘the Act’] order dated 21.09.2020. I.T.A. No. 164/Asr/2020 2 Assessment Years: N/A 2. The assessee has taken the following grounds:
“1. That the Learned CIT (Exemptions), Chandigarh erred in rejecting the application for registration Under Section 12AA of the Income tax Act, 1961 merely on assumptions, presumptions and apprehensions, without appreciating the factual, legal and statutory position for grant of registratio
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 2(15)
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026