SH. PARAMJIT SINGH,LUDHIANA vs. ITO, W-1(2), LUDHIANA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) due to lack of proper opportunity of hearing. The case was remanded back to the CIT(A) for a fresh speaking order after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) resulted in an ex-parte order confirming additions. The assessee argued that they could not appear on the last date due to seeking time to file a paper book and requested the matter be remanded.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without affording a proper opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DIVISION BENCH, CHANDIGARH
Before: MS. DIVA SINGH & SHRI B.R.R.KUMAR
PER DIVA SINGH
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee assailing the correctness of the order dated 11.08.2017 of CIT(A)-1 Ludhiana pertaining to 2008-09 assessment year on various grounds including ground Nos. 1 which reads as under : “That the Commissioner of Income tax(Appeals) has erred in law as passing an ex-parte order without affording a proper opportunity of hearing which is against the Principals of natural Justice and as such the order passed is illegal, arbitrary and unjustified.”
The ld. AR at the time of hearing, inviting attention to para 2 of the impugned order submitted that the assessee appeared all along before the CIT(A), it was only on the last date i.e. 28.07.2017 that the assessee could not appear and in these circumstances, the CIT(A) has presumed that the assessee is not serious in proceeding with the present appeal. It was his submission that the assessee had sought time to file Paper Book and since it could not be prepared by the said date when time had been sought, accordingly, it was his prayer that the impugned order may be set aside and issues be remanded to the CIT(A). The ld. Sr.DR did not oppose the said prayer.
ITA 1488/CHD/2017 A.Y. 2008-09 Page 2 of 2
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. It is seen that scrutiny proceedings were started in the case of the assessee who is a homeopathic medical consultant on the basis of deposits made in the assessee's bank account as per AIR information available with the AO which led to certain additions being made. The additions were challenged before the CIT(A) who passed an ex-parte order confirming the additions. Accordingly, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to set aside the impugned order in the interest of substantial justice taking note of the fact that the order has been passed without hearing the assessee back to the file of the CIT(A) with a direction to pass a speaking order in accordance with law after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard. Said order was pronounced in the Open Court. While so directing, accepting the oral undertaking of the ld. AR, we make it clear that it is hoped that the assessee does not abuse the trust reposed in it and participates fully and fairly. In the eventuality of abuse of the same, we make it clear that CIT(A) would be at liberty to pass an order on the basis of material available on record. 4. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 27.03. 2018.
Sd/- Sd/-
(Dr. B.R.R.KUMAR) (DIVA SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
‘Poonam’ Copy to: 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT 4. The CIT(A) 5. The DR Asstt. Registrar ITAT,Chandigarh.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026