M/S GOODWILL WINES,LUDHIANA vs. PR. CIT-1, LUDHIANA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal granted permission to the assessee to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the Principal CIT(A). During the hearing, the assessee's counsel requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw their appeal before the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DIVISION BENCH, ‘A’ CHANDIGARH
Before: SHRI SANJAY GARG & DR. B.R.R. KUMAR
Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against
the order dated 27.03.2017 of the Principal Commissioner of Income
Tax (Appeals)-1 [hereinafter referred to as CIT(A)], Ludhiana.
In the context of above appeal, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee
has requested that he does not want to pursue the appeal and intends
to withdraw the same and to this effect has submitted a letter dated
1.3.2018 stating therein “we wish to withdraw the above said appeal
as filed u/s 263 and, as such, the necessary permission for the same
may please be granted and oblige”. The Ld. DR has no objection
for the said withdrawal.
In view of the above, we grant permission to the assessee to
withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee is
hereby dismissed as ‘Withdrawn’ Order pronounced in the Open Court.
Sd/- Sd/- (B.R.R.KUMAR) (SANJAY GARG) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated : 01.03.2018 Rkk Copy to: • The Appellant • The Respondent • The CIT • The CIT(A) • The DR
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026