M/S. VIVEK PRINTS,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, AMRITSAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal acknowledged that the matter was sub judice in the civil court and had not yet reached a decision. Consequently, the appeal proceedings were abated.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed an order from the CIT(A) concerning the assessment year 2005-06. The core issue involved disputed fraudulent transactions, which were also under litigation in a civil court.
What were the issues?
Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal should abate appeal proceedings when the underlying disputed transactions are pending adjudication before a Civil Court.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: DR. M. L. MEENA & SH. ANIKESH BANERJEE
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Jammu, Headquarters at Amritsar, in respect of Assessment Year: 2005-06.
At the outset, the Ld. council for the assessee vide appellant’s application dated 17.08.2023 submitted that the Civil Court has not yet given any decision regarding shame/ fraudulent transactions disputed by the AO and the CIT(A) and the next date of hearing is fixed in the civil court on 03.11.2023. He pleaded that the appeal proceedings in the present appeal may be abated with the right to the assessee to revive the appeal on the decision from the civil court regarding the shame/fraudulent transactions to enable it to justify it claim before the Tribunal.
Per Contra, the learned additional CIT (DR) has no objection to the request of the council of the assessee.
Having heard both the sides, perusal of record and impugned orders it is admitted fact on record that the issue raised in grounds before us are sub judice before the Civil Court where it has not yet given any decision regarding shame/ fraudulent transactions pertaining to the disputed additions made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A).In view of that matter, we accept the grievance of the appellant genuine, and accordingly, the appeal proceedings in the present appeal is abated with the right to the assessee to revive the appeal on the decision from the civil court regarding the shame/fraudulent transactions. Accordingly, this appeal is abated.
In the backdrop of the above discussion, the subject appeal is disposed of in the terms indicated above.
Order pronounced in the open court on 23.08.2023
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026