FARIDABAD MENOPAUSE SOCIETY,FARIDABAD vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

PDF · subscribers
ITA 730/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 July 20232 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the CIT(E) had failed to consider the reply and documentary evidence submitted by the assessee. Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT(E) for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(E) dismissing its application for registration under Section 12AA. The assessee did not appear for the hearing, but the Revenue agreed to restore the matter.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(E) properly considered all the submissions and evidence provided by the assessee before dismissing the application for registration under Section 12AA.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AA

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI

Before: Shri C.M. Garg & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Hearing: 08/05/2023Pronounced: 18/07/2023

O R D E R PER C. M. GARG, J. M.:

1. 1. This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the ld CIT(E), Chandigarh dated 30.08.2018.

2. When the appeal was taken up for hearing neither the assessee nor any authorized representative or counsel of the assessee appeared, nor any adjournment application filed. On perusal of the appeal record and after consulting with ld DR, we find that the appeal can be disposed off in absence of assessee, after hearing the argument of the ld Sr. DR. it is pertinent to mention that the notice of today’s hearing has been served on the assessee though dasti service of notice through ITO(E), Faridabad, service report kept on record.

3. The ld DR in all fairness, agreed to the contention of assessee raised in the grounds that the assessee filed reply vide letter dated 30.08.2018 through email in response to the query letter issued by Faridabad Menopause Society ld CIT(E) on 14.08.2018 by email which was omitted to be considered by the ld CIT(A) while passing the impugned order dismissing the application of assessee seeking registration u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. On being asked by the bench the ld CIT DR submitted that the department has no serious objection if the matter is restored to the file of ld CIT(E) for afresh adjudication of application of assessee for grant of registration u/s 12AA of the Act. From pages 63 to 99 of the assessee’s paper book we clearly observe that the assessee filed reply to the query of the ld CIT(E) vide email dated 14.08.2018 enclosing certificate of registration under Rules and regulation listed by the Govt bodies etc but as the reply and documentary evidence has not been considered by the ld CIT(E) while passing the impugned order. Therefore, in view of the foregoing discussion and under the facts and circumstances of the case noted above we find it just and proper to restore the matter to the file of the ld CIT(E) for afresh adjudication of application of assessee seeking registration u/s 12AA of the Act. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 18/07/2023.

More judgments on Section 12AA

All 4,243 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →