VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA,FARIDABAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-II, FARIDABAD
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) should be deleted as the tax dispute was settled under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. The AO was directed to delete the penalty, with liberty to the Revenue to approach if Form No. 5 pertains to a different assessment year.
What were the facts?
The assessee had opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme-2020, and a Form No. 5 for full and final settlement of tax arrears was issued. Despite this, the CIT(A) treated the appeal as withdrawn instead of deleting the penalty.
What were the issues?
Whether a penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) can be sustained when the tax dispute has been settled under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme-2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “SMC” BENCH: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT
PER KUL BHARAT, JM :
The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by Ld.CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”) dated 22.05.2023 for the assessment year 2011-12 .
The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:-
1. “That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, Ld.CIT-A-NFAC grossly erred in sustaining the impugned penalty order u/s 271(1)(c) without appreciating that due taxes have been paid on VSVA-2020, and Form-5 (Order for Full & Final Settlement of Tax Arrear u/s 5(2)), and as such no penalty by the Ld.AO can be levied.
2. That the Appellant prays for the grant of permission to add, alter, delete, modify, any or all of the rounds of appeal at any time on or before or during the time of hearing before the Hon’ble ITAT.”
3. The present appeal filed by the assessee is against the penalty of INR 16,57,425/- imposed by the Assessing Officer (“AO”) u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) order dated 21.03.2022.
4. At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee contended that the tax dispute has been settled under the “Vivad se Vishwas Scheme-2020”. Form No.5 has been issued by the Department. He has also filed a copy of Form No.5. He contended that Ld.CIT(A) instead of deleting the penalty, dismissed the appeal of the assessee on the basis that the appeal would be treated as ‘withdrawn’.
5. On the other hand, Ld. Sr. DR fairly conceded that the penalty should have been deleted. However, he submitted that the Revenue has been granted liberty if the Form No.5 issued by the Department, is found not to be related to Assessment Year under consideration.
6. I have heard Ld. Authorized Representatives of the parties and perused the material available on record. I find that before Ld.CIT(A), it was categorically stated by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that the assessee had opted for “Vivad se Vishwas Scheme-2020.” However, he dismissed the appeal by observing as under:-
“It is seen that the appellant has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and has filed a declaration in accordance with the provisions of section 3 of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 (“the Act”) before the PCIT, Faridabad. Accordingly, Certificate under sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Act was issued to the appellant. Pursuant thereto, the PCIT, Faridabad has certified the full and final settlement of tax arrear and has Page | 2 passed an order under sub-section (2) of section 5 of the Act on 22.10.2021. Further, sub-section (2) of section 4 of the Act provides that the appeal shall be deemed to have been withdrawn from the date on which certificate under sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Act is issued by the designated authority. Since in the instant case a certificate under sub- 0section (1) of the section 5 of the Act is issued as discussed above, the appeal may be treated as withdrawn.”
In view of the terms of “Vivad se Vishwas Scheme-2020”, Penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act deserves to be deleted. I hold accordingly, and direct the AO to delete the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. However, it is clarified that if it is found that the Form No.5 issued by the Competent Authority pertains to different Assessment Year, the Revenue would be at liberty to approach Tribunal for recalling of the order and decision on merit. Grounds raised by the assessee are thus, allowed.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026