ANUVU UK OPERATIONS LTD (ERSTWHILE KNOWN AS GLOBAL EAGLE ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED),LONDON vs. ACIT, INT. TAX. 1(3)(1), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the payments for IFE content do not constitute royalty under the Act or the India-UK DTAA as no copyrights were transferred and the exhibition rights were limited and non-exclusive. It also held that the 'make available' condition for FTS was not met.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a UK-based company, provides in-flight entertainment (IFE) systems and related content services to Indian airlines. The Assessing Officer treated payments received for content as royalty and Fees for Technical Services (FTS), which the assessee disputed.
What were the issues?
Whether payments for providing in-flight entertainment content constitute royalty or FTS under the Income Tax Act and the India-UK DTAA, and whether interest and penalty provisions were correctly applied.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 9(1)(vi),Section 9(1)(vii),Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 234D,Section 270A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence (P) Ltd. v. CIT914 citing125 Taxmann.com 42 · 2021 · SC · Read judgment
- DIT v. New Skies Satellite BV325 citing68 Taxmann.com 8 · 2016 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “D”, DELHI
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM: The issues in these four appeals by the assessee for AY 2018-19 to 2021-22 germinate from identical
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 9(1)(vi)
- Ahaguru Education Technology Private… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1993/CHNY/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- Slack Technologies Limited, Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 979/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Slack Technologies Limited, Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4310/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Atos Information Technology (Singapore) Pte… vs DCIT, (Internation Taxation) Circle…ITA 6745/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs Times Content Limited( Now Known As Times…ITA 5333/DEL/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026