M/S RAMSONS INDUSTRIES LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. PRINCIPAL CIT (CENTRAL ), NAGPUR
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. Considering that the appeal had become infructuous, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not pressed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal with a delay of 9 days. The assessee's representative submitted that the appeal became infructuous as no additions were made in the giving effect order passed by the AO pursuant to a revision order under Section 263.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as not pressed when it has become infructuous due to subsequent developments.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI
आदेश / ORDER
PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM :
This appeal by the assessee against the order dated 17-05-2018 passed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Nagpur for assessment year 2015-16.
We find that this appeal was filed with a delay of 09 days. Upon hearing both the parties, we find that the reasons stated by the assessee are bonafide which really prevented the assessee to file the present appeal in time. Therefore, the delay of 09 days is condoned.
At the outset, we note that Shri Mukesh Agrawal, the ld. AR submits that the present appeal was passed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Nagpur on 17-05-2018 u/s. 263 of the Act in pursuance of which the AO passed giving effect order, wherein, no additions were made. The assessee is not aggrieved by the order of AO as the issue raised in this appeal becomes infructuous in view of no addition made in the giving effect order, but however, he prayed to give liberty to the assessee for restoration of this appeal. We find no order passed by the AO in giving effect proceedings were placed on record before us. Therefore, considering the submissions of ld. AR, we deem it proper to dismiss the present appeal as not pressed with a liberty to file appropriate application for restoration. Thus, the appeal of assessee is dismissed as not pressed.
In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 03rd August, 2023.
Sd/- Sd/- (R.S. Syal) (S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे / Pune; दिनाांक / Dated : 03rd August, 2023. रदव आदेश की प्रधिधलधप अग्रेधर्ि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलार्थी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 2. 3. The Pr. CIT (Central), Nagpur दवभागीय प्रदतदनदि, आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण, नागपूर, 4. / DR, ITAT, Nagpur. गार्ड फ़ाइल / Guard File. 5. //सत्यादपत प्रदत// True Copy// आिेशानुसार / BY ORDER,
वररष्ठ दनजी सदिव / Sr. Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026