M/S RAMSONS INDUSTRIES LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. PRINCIPAL CIT (CENTRAL ), NAGPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 209/NAG/2018Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur03 August 2023AY 2015-16Bench: SHRI R.S. SYAL (Vice President), SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI (Judicial Member)2 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. Considering that the appeal had become infructuous, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not pressed.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal with a delay of 9 days. The assessee's representative submitted that the appeal became infructuous as no additions were made in the giving effect order passed by the AO pursuant to a revision order under Section 263.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as not pressed when it has become infructuous due to subsequent developments.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 263

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI

For Appellant: Shri Mukesh Agrawal
For Respondent: Shri Maurya Pratap

आदेश / ORDER

PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM :

1.

This appeal by the assessee against the order dated 17-05-2018 passed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Nagpur for assessment year 2015-16.

2.

We find that this appeal was filed with a delay of 09 days. Upon hearing both the parties, we find that the reasons stated by the assessee are bonafide which really prevented the assessee to file the present appeal in time. Therefore, the delay of 09 days is condoned.

3.

At the outset, we note that Shri Mukesh Agrawal, the ld. AR submits that the present appeal was passed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Nagpur on 17-05-2018 u/s. 263 of the Act in pursuance of which the AO passed giving effect order, wherein, no additions were made. The assessee is not aggrieved by the order of AO as the issue raised in this appeal becomes infructuous in view of no addition made in the giving effect order, but however, he prayed to give liberty to the assessee for restoration of this appeal. We find no order passed by the AO in giving effect proceedings were placed on record before us. Therefore, considering the submissions of ld. AR, we deem it proper to dismiss the present appeal as not pressed with a liberty to file appropriate application for restoration. Thus, the appeal of assessee is dismissed as not pressed.

4.

In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 03rd August, 2023.

Sd/- Sd/- (R.S. Syal) (S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे / Pune; दिनाांक / Dated : 03rd August, 2023. रदव आदेश की प्रधिधलधप अग्रेधर्ि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलार्थी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 2. 3. The Pr. CIT (Central), Nagpur दवभागीय प्रदतदनदि, आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण, नागपूर, 4. / DR, ITAT, Nagpur. गार्ड फ़ाइल / Guard File. 5. //सत्यादपत प्रदत// True Copy// आिेशानुसार / BY ORDER,

वररष्ठ दनजी सदिव / Sr. Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →