LITTLE FAIRY LTD,NICOSIA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 2(2)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessment orders passed under section 143(3) read with section 144C were barred by limitation for both assessment years. Consequently, all other issues raised on merits became academic and infructuous.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals for assessment years 2015-16 and 2016-17, seeking to raise additional grounds. These grounds pertained to the assessment order being barred by limitation. The Tribunal admitted these additional grounds, citing the Supreme Court's decision in National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment order was barred by limitation due to the improper issuance of a draft assessment order. Whether the Tribunal has the power to admit additional grounds of appeal that are purely legal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- Jute Corporation of India Ltd. v. CIT1,372 citing187 ITR 688 · 1991 · SC
- 74 ITR 254 (Guj) and CIT v. Cellulose Products of India Ltd.96 citing151 ITR 499 · 1985 · HC
- CIT v. Anand Prasad66 citing128 ITR 388 · 1981 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, [ DELHI BENCH “D” : DELHI ]
Before: SHRI G. S. PANNUSHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD
आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. आवेदक / Assessee 2. राज� / Revenue 3. संबंिधत आयकर आयु� / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�- अपील / CIT (A)
I.T.A. Nos. 1511 & 1512/Del/2022
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026