TRIGO SAS,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) -2, PUNE
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that education cess is an additional levy and is included within the tax rate specified in the DTAA. Therefore, it cannot be levied separately. The appeal was allowed on this ground.
What were the facts?
The assessee received software usage charges and management service fees. The CIT(A) confirmed the addition of software usage charges by treating them as royalty and management service fees as fees for technical services. The assessee also objected to the levy of education cess on tax liability computed under the DTAA.
What were the issues?
Whether software usage charges are royalty and management fees are technical fees. Whether education cess is leviable on tax computed as per DTAA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence (P) Ltd. v. CIT914 citing432 ITR 472 · 2021 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. De Beers India Minerals (P.) Ltd.371 citing346 ITR 467 · 2012 · HC
- Steria (India) Ltd. v. CIT83 citing72 Taxmann.com 1 · 2016 · HC
- Sunil v. Motiani v. ITO (International Taxation)39 citing33 Taxmann.com 252 · 2013 · ITAT
- Everest Industries Ltd. v. JCIT24 citing90 Taxmann.com 330 · 2018 · ITAT
- 401 ITR 5610 citing401 ITR 56 · 2018
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI R.S.SYAL, VP & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM
आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, // True Copy // धनजी सधचव / Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अधधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.
Date 1 Draft dictated on 09.09.2021 Sr.PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 14.09.2021 Sr.PS/PS 3 Draft proposed and placed JM/AM before the second Member 4 Draft discussed/approved by AM/JM second Member 5 Approved draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of order Sr.PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr.PS/PS 9 Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R 11 Date of dispatch of order
More judgments on Section 9
- Kohler Co., United States of America vs DCIT, International Taxation, Circle1(2)…ITA 185/BANG/2025[2020-2021]Status: Disposed27 Aug 2026AY 2020-2021
- ACIT, Delhi vs Gamma Pizzakraft Lanka (Private) Limited…ITITA 27/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed12 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
- ACIT, New Delhi vs Gamma Pizzakraft Lanka (Private) Limited…ITITA 26/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed12 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (Int Tax)… vs Mercedes-Benz Group Ag, MumbaiITA 2879/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2020-21
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (Int Tax)… vs Mercedes-Benz Group Ag, MumbaiITA 2878/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026