M/S. KUVAWALA DRILL EQUIP,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, HQ-6(2), PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2534/PUN/2017Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 October 2021AY 2010-118 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer cannot rely on 'borrowed satisfaction' from other agencies for reopening assessments. Independent application of mind and proper inquiry are mandatory prerequisites for initiating reassessment proceedings under Section 147.

What were the facts?

The Assessing Officer reopened assessments based solely on information received from the Sales Tax Department regarding alleged hawala transactions. The assessee contended that the reopening was invalid due to a lack of independent application of mind by the Assessing Officer.

What were the issues?

Whether the reopening of assessment under Section 147/148 was valid when the Assessing Officer relied solely on information from the Sales Tax Department without independent inquiry. Whether the reassessment proceedings were void ab initio due to lack of independent application of mind.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 148,Section 143(3),Section 69C

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, PUNE

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY

For Appellant: Shri D.P Shroff
For Respondent: Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav
Hearing: 21.10.2021Pronounced: 26.10.2021

आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER,

// True Copy // धनजी सधचव / Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अधधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.

Date 1 Draft dictated on 21.10.2021 Sr.PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 26.10.2021 Sr.PS/PS 3 Draft proposed and placed JM/AM before the second Member 4 Draft discussed/approved by AM/JM second Member 5 Approved draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of order Sr.PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr.PS/PS 9 Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R 11 Date of dispatch of order

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →