DIGNITY EDUCATION SOCIETY,RAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the assessee already had registration under Section 12AA, which had not been revoked, and considering previous judicial precedents, the denial of 80G approval solely on the grounds of surplus income and minor procedural issues was not justified. The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(E).
What were the facts?
The assessee, Dignity Education Society, applied for exemption under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) denied the approval, citing that the society was primarily engaged in educational activities, charged substantial fees, generated significant surplus income, and had discrepancies like no visible signboard and an inability to produce audited accounts for the relevant year.
What were the issues?
Whether the denial of 80G approval is justified when the assessee holds a valid 12AA registration and the reasons for denial are primarily surplus income and minor procedural lapses.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Rajmala Education Society5 citing65 DTR 307 · 2012 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI RAVISH SOOD & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI
PER RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM: This appeal is filed by the assessee aggrieved from the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Bhopal [ Here in after referred as Ld. CIT(E)] for the assessment year 2018-19 dated 26.12.2018 denying exemption under sectin 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [ here in after referred to as “Act” ] .
The only issue assailed by the assessee in this appeal is on account of an order passed by
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026