THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, VIZIANAGARAM vs. SRI GOVINDA JEWELLERS, VIZIANAGARAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the addition of unaccounted sales was not required as the sales were already accounted for in the books. It also held that taxing the gross profit on these sales would amount to double taxation.
What were the facts?
During a survey, the assessee jewellery firm admitted to unexplained purchases and unaccounted sales. However, in its return, the firm admitted to a lower amount of income than what was stated during the survey.
What were the issues?
Whether the addition of unaccounted sales and gross profit on such sales amounts to double taxation, and whether the admission of additional grounds by the CIT(A) was justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. S. Khader Khan Son581 citing352 ITR 480 · 2013 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, HON’BLE & SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, HON’BLE
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेपिि/Copy of the order forwarded to:- ननधधाररती/ The Assessee – Sri Govinda Jewellers, 8-1-56, 57, Main 1. Road, Vizianagaram – 535002. रधजस्व/The Revenue – Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Koppuguranna 2. Building, Siddarth Nagar, Vizianagaram-535003. 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Visakhapatnam. आयकर आयुक्त (अऩीऱ)/ The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, 4. Visakhapatnam. ववभधगीय प्रनतननधध, आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, ववशधखधऩटणम/ DR, ITAT, 5. Visakhapatnam गधर्ा फ़धईऱ / Guard file 6.
आदेशधनुसधर / BY ORDER
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Visakhapatnam
More judgments on Section 133A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ranchhodbhai Kurjibhai Kakadiya, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 553/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Amr Infrastructures, Hyderabad vs DCIT., Central Circle-2(1), HyderabadITA 818/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Vikaskumar Macwan, Nadiad vs Dc/ACIT Central Circle 3, VadodaraITA 2022/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026