SHRI GOPICHAND P PANJWANI,AKOLA vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RANG-1, NAGPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 135/NAG/2019Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur29 August 2023AY 2015-16Bench: SHRI R.S. SYAL, HON. (Vice President), SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, HON. (Judicial Member)3 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the fee under Section 234E was not imposable for the period prior to June 1, 2015, following High Court decisions. However, for periods on or after June 1, 2015, the fee was correctly levied.

What were the facts?

The appeals concerned the levy of fees for default in furnishing statements under Section 234E of the Income Tax Act. The issue revolved around whether the fee was applicable for periods prior to June 1, 2015.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the applicability of Section 234E fees for defaults in furnishing TDS/TCS statements before June 1, 2015.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 234E,Section 200,Section 206C

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH :: NAGPUR

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL, HON. VICE- & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, HON.

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Thakar,Adv
For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal, DR
Hearing: 24/08/2023Pronounced: 29/08/2023

Assessee by : Shri Sanjay Thakar,Adv. Revenue by : Shri Sanjay Agrawal, DR Date of hearing : 24/08/2023 Date of pronouncement : 29/08/2023 O R D E R Per PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM:

These appeals preferred by the different assessees emanate from the separate orders of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [for short, ‘CIT(A)’]-2, Nagpur, all dated 14.12.2018 for A.Ys.2015-16 & 2016-17 as per the grounds of appeal on record.

2. All these matters pertains to the solitary issue of levy of fee for -138/NAG/2019 Gopichand P. Panjwani & Ano. default in furnishing statements u/sec. 234E of the Act in respect of statement referred to in sub-section (3) of sec. 200 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of sec. 206C. Since the facts and circumstances and issues in these appeals are absolutely similar and identical, all the matters were heard together and disposed off vide this consolidated order.

3. We observe that the Hon'ble Kerala High Court in Olari Little Flower Kuries (P.) Ltd. v. UOI & Ors. (2022) 440 ITR 26 (Ker.) has confirmed the non-imposition of fee for the period prior to 01/06/2015. Similar view has been taken in JIJI Varghese v. ITO (TDS) (2022) 443 ITR 267 (Ker.) holding that no interest u/sec. 234E can be imposed for the period of respective assessment years prior to June 01, 2015. In that regard, we observe in F.Y. 2014-15 relevant to A.Y. 2015-16, the said decisions will squarely apply. Similarly, for F.Y. 2014-15 relevant to the A.Y. 2015-16 will also be covered in favour of the assessee by the aforesaid decisions.

4. Respectfully following the aforestated decisions, the cases of the assessees in & 137/NAG/2019 are decided in favour of the assessees and these appeals are allowed. However, in ITA No.136/NAG/2019 pertains to F.Y. 2015-16 relevant to A.Y. 2016-17 and the levying of fees after or from 01/06/2015 is covered within the financial year itself. Similarly in ITA No.138/NAG/2019 also pertains 2 -138/NAG/2019 Gopichand P. Panjwani & Ano. to F.Y. 2015-16 relevant to A.Y. 2016-17 wherein it is observed that fee u/sec. 234E has been rightly levied from or after 01/06/2015 within the financial year itself. Therefore, in respect of these two appeals of the assessees, the above judicial pronouncements will not be applicable, and as observed by us, the fee u/sec. 234E has been correctly levied by the Department. Resultantly, these two appeals of the assessees are dismissed.

5.

In the combined result, appeals filed by the assessees in & 137/NAG/2019 are allowed and in ITA Nos.136 & 138/NAG/2019 are dismissed.

Order pronounced in open Court on 29th August, 2023.

More judgments on Section 234E

All 4,792 judgments and leading authorities on Section 234E →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →