DCIT INTL. TAX CIRCLE-1(2)(2), NEW DELHI vs. EVEREST GLOBAL INC., USA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the marketing, sales, and consultancy services rendered by the assessee did not qualify as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) or Fee for Included Services (FIS) under Article 12 of the India-USA DTAA. This was because the services did not involve making available technical knowledge or skill, nor did they involve the transfer of technology.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a US-based consulting firm, received payments for marketing, sales, and consultancy services. The Assessing Officer treated these receipts as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) taxable in India. The CIT(A) partially deleted additions but sustained those related to marketing and sales services.
What were the issues?
Whether marketing, sales, and consultancy services rendered by a non-resident without a Permanent Establishment in India are taxable as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) or Fee for Included Services (FIS) under the India-USA DTAA, particularly concerning the 'make available' clause.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(10)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. De Beers India Minerals (P.) Ltd.371 citing21 Taxmann.com 214 · 2012 · HC
- Director of Income Tax v. Sheraton International Inc.48 citing178 Taxmann 84 · 2009 · HC · Read judgment
- Para 3.1, 5.2, 12.1, 13 8. DCIT v. Boston Consulting Group Pte. Ltd.40 citing94 ITD 31 · 2005 · ITAT
- Para 26 9. Bombardier Transportation Sweden AB v. DCIT22 citing125 Taxmann.com 277 · 2021
- Para 8 3. Netafim Ltd. v. DCIT14 citing145 Taxmann.com 412 · 2022
- Para 21, 22, 24, 25, 26 10. Magotteaux International SA v. DCIT13 citing141 Taxmann.com 8 · 2022
- 73, 74, 75, 76, 77), Para 27 12. Laserwords US Inc. v. DCIT12 citing162 Taxmann.com 543 · 2024
- Para 19, 20, 21 11. ACIT v. Sheraton Overseas Management Corporation12 citing159 Taxmann.com 482 · 2024
- 149 Taxmann.com 29510 citing149 Taxmann.com 295 · 2023
- Para 7,8 6. Cameron (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. v. DCIT10 citing153 Taxmann.com 301 · 2023
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘D’ BENCH,
Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
PER BENCH:- The above captioned bunch of six separate appeals by the assessee and four separate cross appeals by the Revenue are preferred against the order of the ld. CIT(A), Delhi-44 dated 22.02.2023 pertaini
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026