BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCEL-51(1), NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that there was a reasonable cause for the delay in filing the appeal. Therefore, the CIT(A) was directed to condone the delay and adjudicate the appeal afresh.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Bank of India, filed an appeal before the CIT(A) which was dismissed due to delay. The assessee contended that the delay was due to internal mechanisms of the public sector bank.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) was justifiable and if the CIT(A) should have condoned the delay.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH : : NAGPUR
Before: SHRI S.S.GODARA & DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE
ORDER
PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld.CIT(A)[NFAC], Pune under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 19.10.2022 emanating from the assessment order under section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 27.03.2019 for the A.Y.2012-13.
Bank of India, Itwari Branch [A]
The ld.Authorised Representative(ld.AR) for the Assessee submitted that assessee’s appeal was dismissed by the ld.CIT(A) on account of delay, without condoning delay. The ld.AR submitted that the order under section 201 was passed on 27.03.2019. The ld.AR submitted that it is a Public Sector Bank and due to internal mechanisms, there has been delay in fling appeal. The ld.AR submitted that a lenient view may be taken and case may kindly be set-aside.
The ld.Departmental Representative(ld.DR) for the Revenue relied on the orders of the Lower Authorities.
It is observed that ld.CIT(A) dismissed assessee’s appeal on the ground of delay. We find that there was reasonable cause for delay. Therefore, we direct the ld.CIT(A) to condone the delay. Accordingly, order of the ld.CIT(A) is set-aside to ld.CIT(A) for denovo adjudication after giving opportunity. The assessee shall provide all the necessary document required by the ld.CIT(A). Accordingly, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose.
Bank of India, Itwari Branch [A]
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in the open Court on 6th October, 2023.
More judgments on Section 201(1)
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- Tmw Fintech Private Limited, Mumbai vs Circle 14(1)(2), MumbaiITA 30/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- State Bank of India, Guna vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, GwaliorITA 432/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- State Bank of India Regional Business… vs Income Tax Officer, TDS Gwalior, GwaliorITA 420/AGR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- State Bank of India, Tikamgarh vs Income Tax Officer, TDS ITO (TDS) Gwalior…ITA 411/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026