BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCEL-51(1), NAGPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 390/NAG/2022Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur06 October 2023AY 2012-13Bench: SHRI S.S.GODARA (Judicial Member), DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE (Accountant Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that there was a reasonable cause for the delay in filing the appeal. Therefore, the CIT(A) was directed to condone the delay and adjudicate the appeal afresh.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Bank of India, filed an appeal before the CIT(A) which was dismissed due to delay. The assessee contended that the delay was due to internal mechanisms of the public sector bank.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) was justifiable and if the CIT(A) should have condoned the delay.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 250,Section 201(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH : : NAGPUR

Before: SHRI S.S.GODARA & DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sardani – CA
For Respondent: Dr. Kaumudi Patil- CIT-DR
Hearing: 21/09/2023Pronounced: 06/10/2023

ORDER

PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM:

1.

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld.CIT(A)[NFAC], Pune under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 19.10.2022 emanating from the assessment order under section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 27.03.2019 for the A.Y.2012-13.

Bank of India, Itwari Branch [A]

2.

The ld.Authorised Representative(ld.AR) for the Assessee submitted that assessee’s appeal was dismissed by the ld.CIT(A) on account of delay, without condoning delay. The ld.AR submitted that the order under section 201 was passed on 27.03.2019. The ld.AR submitted that it is a Public Sector Bank and due to internal mechanisms, there has been delay in fling appeal. The ld.AR submitted that a lenient view may be taken and case may kindly be set-aside.

3.

The ld.Departmental Representative(ld.DR) for the Revenue relied on the orders of the Lower Authorities.

4.

It is observed that ld.CIT(A) dismissed assessee’s appeal on the ground of delay. We find that there was reasonable cause for delay. Therefore, we direct the ld.CIT(A) to condone the delay. Accordingly, order of the ld.CIT(A) is set-aside to ld.CIT(A) for denovo adjudication after giving opportunity. The assessee shall provide all the necessary document required by the ld.CIT(A). Accordingly, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose.

Bank of India, Itwari Branch [A]

5.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in the open Court on 6th October, 2023.

More judgments on Section 201(1)

All 3,835 judgments and leading authorities on Section 201(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →