PRAYAS JUVENILE AID CENTRE,NEW DELHI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1595/DEL/2023Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 November 2023AY 2016-17Bench: SH. N. K. BILLAIYA (Accountant Member), MS. ASTHA CHANDRA (Judicial Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal held that the assessee should be given another opportunity to defend its claim for registration. The case was restored to the CIT(Exemption) for a fresh decision after providing a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

What were the facts?

The assessee's registration under Section 10(23C)(iv) was cancelled by the CIT(Exemption) without proper notice or opportunity to be heard. The assessee argued that it was denied a fair chance to present its case and furnish documents.

What were the issues?

Whether the cancellation of registration was done in violation of natural justice principles due to lack of proper notice and opportunity to be heard.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 10(23C)(iv)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’, NEW DELHI

Before: SH. N. K. BILLAIYA & MS. ASTHA CHANDRA

Hearing: 09/11/2023Pronounced: 09/11/2023

BEFORE SH. N. K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS. ASTHA CHANDRA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2016-17 Prayas Juvenile Aid Centre CIT(Exemption) 59, Tuglakabad Institution New Delhi Area, New Delhi Vs. PAN No.ADSPJ0736H (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by Sh. Gaurav Kalra, CA Respondent by Sh. P.N. Barnwal, CIT DR Date of hearing: 09/11/2023 Date of Pronouncement: 09/11/2023 ORDER

PER N. K. BILLAIYA, AM:

1.

This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the CIT(Exemption), Delhi dated 31-03-2023 pertaining to A.Y.2016-17.

2.

The grievance of the assessee read as under :- 1. The learned CTT (Exemption) passed the order under 15th proviso to Section 1023CK) Nor cancellation of registration us 1023Cxis) of The Income Tax Act without considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without giving any opportunity of being heard which is against the natural justice. 2. The learned CTT (Exemption) also erred in cancelling the exemption us 1023CHNY of The Income Tax Act with retrospective effect from AY 2016-17. 3. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter or forgo any grounds of appeal either before or at the time of hearing of the appeal.

3.

At the very outset the Counsel for the assessee stated that no proper notices were issued and served upon the assessee and the assessee was denied fair opportunity for furnishing the requisite documents.

4.

The DR pointed out that the assessee had availed the opportunities as part of details were furnished by it. 5. Without going into the merits of the case we are of the considered view that the assessee should get one more opportunity to defend its claim of registration u/s. 10 (23C)(iv) of the Act. Therefore, in the interest of justice and fair play we restore the entire quarrel to the files of the CIT(E). The CIT(E) is directed to decide the issue of registration afresh after affording a reasonable and adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee and the assessee is directed to attend the proceedings and furnish all the necessary details in support of its claim of registration u/s. 10 (23C)(iv) of the Act.

6.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.

7.

Decision announced in the open court on 09.11.2023.

More judgments on Section 10(23C)(iv)

All 149 judgments and leading authorities on Section 10(23C)(iv) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →