ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S NUWAVE E SOLUTIONS (P) LTD., NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, holding that foreign exchange fluctuation gains are eligible for Section 10A exemption. It also ruled that Section 40(a)(ia) is not applicable to share buy-back payments as they are not claimed as expenditure, and even a lower TDS deduction satisfies the compliance requirement.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a software export company, claimed deduction under Section 10A on an 'Arbitration Award' and foreign exchange fluctuation gains. The Assessing Officer (AO) denied exemption on the award, treating it as not software sale, and also denied exemption on currency gains. Additionally, the AO disallowed a portion of share buy-back payments due to alleged short TDS deduction.
What were the issues?
Whether foreign exchange fluctuation gains are eligible for Section 10A exemption and whether Section 40(a)(ia) applies to share buy-back payments with short TDS deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Woodward Governor India Pvt. Ltd.968 citing312 ITR 254 · 2009 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. S.K. Tekriwal150 citing361 ITR 432 · 2014 · HC
- CIT v. Madras Motors Ltd.49 citing238 ITR 377 · 2002 · HC
- Smt.Sujata Grover v. DCIT25 citing74 TTJ 347 · 2002 · ITAT
- DCIT v. K. K. Doshi and Co.21 citing245 ITR 849 · 2000 · HC
- Technologies (P) Ltd. v. ACIT11 citing94 TTJ 557 · 2005 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “E” BENCH: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SUDHIR KUMAR & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM : The captioned appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order dated 15.03.2011 passed by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)-XVI, New Delhi [“CIT(A)”, in short] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] arising from the assessment order dated 31.12.2010 passed u/s 143(3) of the Act pertaining to Assessment Year 2007-08. 2. Brief facts of the case are that assessee is a company and e- filed its return of income on 30.08.2007, declaring total income of INR 1,45,48,453/-. The said return was revised on 20.08.2008, declaring the same income as was declared the return
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10A
- Ahaguru Education Technology Private… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1993/CHNY/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- M/S. Aradhyaa Infra & Holdings Pvt. Ltd… vs ITO, Corp. Ward-1(1), ChennaiITA 1793/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Tech Mahindra Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 2(3), MumbaiITA 7487/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: Disposed24 Aug 2026AY 2008-09
- D.C.I.T. Circle 3(3), Mumbai vs Rbs Business Services P. Ltd., MumbaiITA 4467/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
- Rbs Business Services P.Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 3(3), MumbaiITA 4306/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026