KRRISH REALTECH PVT LTD,JASOLA DISTRICT CENTER vs. JCIT (OSD), JHANDEWALAN EXTN.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal heard the appeals filed by the assessee against the orders of the CIT(A). The specific details of the CIT(A)'s orders and the Tribunal's findings are not provided in the excerpt.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Krrish Realtech Pvt. Ltd., filed multiple appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) for various assessment years. The appeals were heard by the ITAT Delhi Bench.
What were the issues?
The core issue revolves around the assessee's appeals against the CIT(A)'s orders. The specific grounds of appeal and the legal questions are not detailed in the excerpt.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not specified in the provided text
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘C’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRIS.RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S.
Heard together (7 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
(Assessment Year : 2016-17) (Assessment Year : 2016-17) Krrish Realtech Pvt. Ltd., vs. DCIT, Central Circle 27, Basement – 1, Elegance Tower, New Delhi. Jasola District Centre, New Delhi – 110 025. (PAN : AAECK0193K) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri Anmol Jha, Advocate Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal, Advocate REVENUE BY : Shri Om Prakash. Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 15.09.2025 Date of Order : 17.09.2025 O R D E R PER S.RIFAUR RAHMAN,ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
1. 1. These appeals are filed by the assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Delhi-31 [“ld. CIT(A)”, for short] dated 07.03.2025 for Assessment Years 2012-13 to 2016-17 against the orders passed u/s 143(3)/147, 271(1)(c) and 201(1)/201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’).
2. Since the issues are common and the appeals are connected, hence the same are heard together and being disposed off by this common order.
3. At the time of hearing, ld. AR of the assessee submitted that assessee has preferred appeals before ld. CIT (A) but no compliance was made on various notices issued by the ld. CIT (A) and the details are reproduced in the appellate order and the appeals of the assessee were dismissed in limine. Accordingly, he prayed that all these appeals may be restored to the file of ld. CIT (A).
4. On the other hand, ld. DR of the Revenue has not expressed any serious objection and fairly accepted that he has no objection if the matter is restored back to the file of ld. CIT (A).
5. Considered the rival submissions and material placed on record. We observe that the additions were sustained by the ld. CIT (A) relying on the order of Assessing Officer ex-parte. Therefore, in the interest of to 3054/DEL/2025 justice, we direct ld. CIT (A) to give an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and decide the issue on merit as per law. We also direct assessee to make proper submissions and appear before the ld.CIT (A) on the date of hearing and cooperate with the tax authorities. Accordingly, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on this 17th day of September, 2025.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026