SAVANNAH SEEDS PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-22(2), DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessment was completed before the due date, and Form 3CL was obtained shortly thereafter. In the interest of justice, the matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer to consider the submitted Form 3CL and provide relief if it was in order.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed weighted deduction for scientific research expenditure under Section 35(2AB). The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction for non-submission of Form 3CL, which was issued by the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR). The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance of weighted deduction under Section 35(2AB) is justified solely on the basis of non-submission of Form 3CL during the assessment proceedings, especially when it was obtained subsequently.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘G’ : NEW DELHI
(PAN : AAOCS9422M) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri Aakash Uppal, CA REVENUE BY : Shri Anuj Garg, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 14.12.2023 Date of Order : 19.12.2023 ORDER
PER SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of ld. CIT (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) dated 15.03.2023 for the Assessment Year 2018-19.
Grounds of appeal
taken by the assessee are as under :-
1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, and in law, the Assessment Order passed by National e-Assessment Centre ('NeAC') and National Faceless Appeal Centre ('NF AC') is bad in law.
2. That NeAC and NFAC grossly erred on facts and in law in making disallowance of weighted deduction of expenditure on scientific research amounting to INR 1,94,43,483 under section 35(2AB) of the Act on the basis that the appellant has failed to submit Form 3CL issued by Department of Scientific and Industrial Research ('DSIR'), certifying the amount of expenses incurred by the appellant on research activities.
3. That the NFAC grossly erred in law by upholding the disallowance made by NeAC on account of non-submission of Form 3CL, without appreciating that assessment proceedings were concluded 53 days before time barring date, while Form 3CL was duly issued within such period by DSIR.
4. The NeAC and NF AC failed to appreciate that delay in issue of Form 3CL by DSIR was owing to surge in Covid-19 cases, which further lead to delay on appellant's part to submit Form 3CL to income tax office during the course of assessment proceedings.
5. Without prejudice to the above, the NeAC and NFAC grossly erred on facts and in law in not appreciating that the appellant had itself disallowed an amount of INR 1,29,62,322 in the income-tax return and disallowance of INR 1,94,43,483 amounts to double disallowance to the extent of INR 1,29,62,322.”
Brief facts of the case are that in this case, Assessing Officer made disallowance of deduction under section 35(2AB) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) amounting to Rs.1,94,43,483/- and the reason was absence of Form 3CL which was not submitted by the assessee. The relevant portion of the assessment order is as under :-
“Disallowance of deduction u/s 35(2AB) of the IT Act: On perusal of the records, it is seen that the assessee has claimed expenses(deduction) on in house R&D u/s 35(2AB) of the IT Act amounting to Rs.1,29,62,322/- in the computation of income. Subsequently, the assessee has claimed deduction
Rs. 1 ,94,43,483/-u/s 35(2)AB of the IT Act. The assessee vide reply 04.01.2021 submitted Form3CM, Form 3CK and further stated that the copy of form 3CL is pending with DSIR department and will be uploaded by the end of January 2021. In the interest of natural justice the assessee was allowed the stipulated period as requested however the assessee failed to furnish the same till date. The assessee uploaded form 3CM and Form 3CK however Form 3CL has not been submitted in support of his claim.
4.2 Since the assessee did not furnish the complete appropriate details/documents pertaining to claiming of deduction u/s 35(2AB) of the IT Act, 1961 in spite of giving sufficient time ,the deduction claimed of Rs.1,94,43,483/- (actual expenses i.e 1,29,62,322/-) is hereby disa710w d and added back to the total income of the assessee.”
Against the above order, assessee appealed before the ld. CIT (A) who confirmed the addition.
Against this order, assessee has filed appeal before the ITAT. We have heard both the parties and perused the records.
Ld. Counsel of the assessee contended that the assessment order in this case was passed on 05.02.2021. He pleaded that the due date for completion of assessment was 31.03.2021. He further informed that Form 3CL was duly obtained on 25.02.2021. Ld. Counsel submitted that Form 3CL was presented before the ld. CIT (A) who still confirmed the addition.
Per contra, ld. DR for the Revenue relied upon the orders of the authorities below.
Upon careful consideration, we find that the disallowance in this case has solely been made on account of absence of Form 3CL issued by the DSIR. AO completed the assessment on 05.02.2021. Form 3CL was duly issued by DSIR on 25.02.2021. In the interest of justice, in our considered opinion, this issue needs to be remitted to the file of AO. AO shall consider the Form 3CL being submitted by the assessee. If the same is in order the AO will provide the necessary relief/deduction. Needless to add, assessee should be provided an opportunity of being heard.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on this 19th day of December, 2023.
More judgments on Section 35(2AB)
- Aeon Formulations Private Limited, Chennai vs Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 2(1)…ITA 2481/CHNY/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Devarsons Industries Pvt.Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The D.C.I.T. Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2327/AHD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Ceat Limited, Mumbai vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 8146/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Forbes Marshall Pvt. Ltd., Pune vs Income Tax Officer Circle 8, PuneITA 3206/PUN/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Pochjraja Industries Ltd., Hosur vs ACIT, Circle-1, HosurITA 1072/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Jyoti Consultants, Agrahat vs. Pr. Commissioner GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Sahoo Supply Agency vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And CustomsOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Gopal Aromatic PVT. LTD., Cuttack vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Nourangi Paints vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026