DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S WICKWOOD DEVELOPMENT LTD., NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessments made under Section 153C for the relevant assessment years were outside the scope of the section due to the date of the satisfaction note. Consequently, the assessments were deemed void ab initio.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals against the CIT(A) orders, while the assessee filed cross-objections. The core issue revolved around the validity of proceedings initiated under Section 153C for assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08, based on a satisfaction note recorded on November 18, 2013, following a search on March 22, 2012.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the proceedings initiated under Section 153C were valid given the dates of the search, satisfaction note, and the relevant assessment years, and whether the assessments were barred by limitation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153C,Section 6(3)(ii),Section 9(1),Section 124(4),Section 144C,Section 143(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- SSP Aviation Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax308 citing346 ITR 177 · 2012 · HC
- Pepsi Foods (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT225 citing367 ITR 112 · 2014 · HC
- Commissioner of Income Tax v. Mechmen129 citing60 Taxmann.com 484 · 2015 · HC
- Tax v. Gopi Apartments123 citing360 ITR 411 · 2014
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘D’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Saktijit DeyDr. B. R. R. Kumar
Heard together (4 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per Bench: The present appeals by the Revenue and the Cross Objections by the assessee have been filed against the orders of ld. CIT(A)-XXVII, New Delhi. CO Nos. 358 & 359/Del/2015 Wickwood Development Ltd. .
The common grounds raised in ITA Nos. 3354 & 3355/Del/2015. In ITA No. 3354/Del/201
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026