M/S CANARA BANK (ERSTWHILE SYNDICATE BANK) PANAJI BRANCH,PANAJI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), WARD - 1, PANAJI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee's representative filed withdrawal applications for all appeals. The departmental representative had no objection to the withdrawal. The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal applications.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Canara Bank (erstwhile Syndicate Bank), filed seven appeals against orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) concerning assessment years 2011-12 to 2017-18. These orders arose from assessment orders passed by the Income Tax Officer (TDS).
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeals by the assessee before the Tribunal, without delving into the merits of the case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PANJI BENCH, PANAJI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI S. S. GODARA & SHRI G. D. PADMAHSHALI
ORDER PER G. D. PADMAHSHALI; This bunch of seven appeals of the Assessee is directed against separate orders of Commissioner of Income Tax- (Appeals) Panaji-1, Panaji dt. 21/01/2019, passed u/s 201(1) & 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [‘the Act’ in short] which in turn arisen from respective orders of assessment passed by the Income Tax Officer(TDS), Ward-1, Panaji-Goa for the assessment years 2011-12 to 2017-18.
ITAT-Panaji Page 1 of 2
Canara Bank(Erstwhile Syndicate Bank) ITA No’s.124 to 130/PAN/2019 AY’s : 2011-12 to 2017-18 2. On this date of virtual hearing, at the outset, without going into the merits of the case, the learned representative for the assessee referring to separate withdrawal applications dt. 12/07/2023 reiterated the contents thereof and has prayed for withdrawal of these appeals. Recording no objection from the learned departmental representative in allowing withdrawal prayer of the appellant, we order accordingly.
Resultantly, this bunch of seven appeals of the assessee is DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. In terms of rule 34 of ITAT Rules, the order pronounced in the open court on this Tuesday 01st of August, 2023.
-S/d- -S/d- S. S. GODARA G. D. PADMAHSHALI JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / PUNE ; दिन ांक / Dated : 01st day of August, 2023. आदेश की प्रधिधलधप अग्रेधर्ि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1.अपील र्थी / The Appellant. 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 3. The CIT(A)-Panaji-1, Panaji 6.ग र्डफ़ इल / Guard File. 5. DR, ITAT, Panaji Bench 4. The Pr. CIT, Panaji SGR* (Allotment 0:7 ) आिेश नुस र / By Order, वररष्ठदनजीसदिव / Sr. Private Secretary आयकरअपीलीयन्य य दिकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.
ITAT-Panaji Page 2 of 2
More judgments on Section 201(1)
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- Tmw Fintech Private Limited, Mumbai vs Circle 14(1)(2), MumbaiITA 30/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- State Bank of India, Guna vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, GwaliorITA 432/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- State Bank of India Regional Business… vs Income Tax Officer, TDS Gwalior, GwaliorITA 420/AGR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- State Bank of India, Tikamgarh vs Income Tax Officer, TDS ITO (TDS) Gwalior…ITA 411/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026