KARNATAK GOA PRADESH MAHESHWARI SABHA,BIJAPUR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), BENGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(E)'s order and remanded the matter back for re-adjudication. The assessee was granted one final opportunity to submit the necessary documents.
What were the facts?
The assessee-trust applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application due to the assessee's failure to furnish required details, including the registered amended Memorandum of Association.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of the application for registration under Section 12AA was justified without providing a final opportunity to submit missing documents.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PANAJI BENCH :: PANAJI
This appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Bangalore (for short, ‘CIT(E)’), dated 17.02.2022 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
The solitary grievance as evident from the grounds of appeal in the appeal memo filed by the assessee is the rejection of application for registration u/sec. 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘the Act’).
We observe from perusal of the order passed by the ld. CIT(E) Karnataka Goa Pradesh Maheshwari Sabha that applicant-trust M/s.Karnataka Goa Pradesh Maheshwari Sabha had made an application in Form 10A for registration u/sec. 12AA of the Act before the Department. There were certain discrepancies detected during the process of this application and accordingly, the assessee-trust was asked to furnish various details as is enumerated in the order of ld.CIT(E). However, assessee-trust had failed to furnish registered amended Memorandum of Association (MoA). These details will enable the ld. CIT(E) to satisfy himself regarding the objects of the assessee-trust and the genuineness of its activities. Furthermore, whether assessee-trust is incompliance with the prevalent laws in force will also have to be verified. The only reason for rejection of application for registration by the Department was that assessee-trust had not filed these requisite details as called for by the office of ld. CIT(E). Therefore, in the interest of justice, we are of the considered view, one final opportunity should be given to the assessee-trust to file its relevant details specifically the registered amended MoA etc. before the ld.CIT(E) and in view thereof, we set aside the order of ld. CIT(E) and remand the matter back to his file for re-adjudication on merits as per law complying with the principles of natural justice and considering the various documents/evidences that would be furnished before him by the assessee-trust. The grounds of appeal
of the assessee-trust are disposed off and allowed for statistical purposes. Karnataka Goa Pradesh Maheshwari Sabha
4. In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in open Court on 21st August, 2023.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026