PRATAP DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE,AZAMGARH vs. ITO (TDS), AZAMGARH

PDF · subscribers
ITA 43/VNS/2020Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi04 July 2022AY 2013-20162 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal as it was not maintainable because the CIT(A) had not yet passed an order for AY 2013-14. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh appeal if necessary.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT for AY 2013-14, but later realized the appeal before the CIT(A) for the same year was still pending. The AO had passed a consolidated order for AY 2013-14 to 2015-16, and the CIT(A) had only disposed of appeals for AY 2014-15 and 2015-16.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal filed before the ITAT is maintainable when the appeal before the lower appellate authority (CIT(A)) is still pending adjudication.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 201(1),Section 201(1A)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CIRCUIT BENCH, VARANASI

For Appellant: Shri. Pankaj Choubey, C.A
Hearing: 04.07.2022Pronounced: 04.07.2022

O R D E R PER VIJAY PAL RAO, J.M. This appeal is filed by the assessee allegedly against the order of the CIT(A) arising from order passed under section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2013-14.

2.

At the time hearing, the learned AR of the assessee has submitted that the assessee has filed an application alongwith affidavit dated 02.07.2022 for withdrawal of this appeal on the ground that the appeal filed before the CIT(A) for this assessment year is still pending and has not been adjudicated. He has further pointed out that the assessee has inadvertently filed this appeal because the AO has passed a consolidated order under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) for the assessment years 2013-14 to 2015-16. Whereas, the CIT(A) disposed of the appeals filed by the assessee only for the assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16 and the appeal for the assessment year 2013-14 is yet to be decided. Thus the learned AR has submitted that the assessee may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to file the appeal if any against the order of the CIT(A) whenever it is passed. The learned DR has not raised any objection if the present appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

3.

Having considered the rival submissions as well as relevant facts, we note that the appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment year 2013-14 is nonest appeal due to the reason that there was no impugned order of the CIT(A) for this assessment year. The appeal of the assessee is still pending adjudication before the CIT(A) and therefore, the present appeal of the assessee is otherwise not maintainable. Accordingly, we allow the assessee to withdraw the present appeal and consequently the same is dismissed being withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to file the appeal, if need arises against the outcome of the appeal pending before the CIT(A).

4.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year 2013- 14 is dismissed being withdrawn. Order was pronounced in the open court after a conclusion of hearing on 04.07.2022.

More judgments on Section 201(1)

All 3,835 judgments and leading authorities on Section 201(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →