Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PANAJI
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI
आदेश / ORDER
PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM :
This appeal by the assessee against the order dated 23-11-2016 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Panaji [‘CIT(A)’] for assessment year 2003-04.
The assessee raised three grounds of appeal amongst which the only issue emanates for our consideration is as to whether the CIT(A) justified in not accepting the contention of the assessee in granting 100% of certified export profits in the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. We note that the assessee filed return of income declaring a total income of Rs.18,39,13,318/- on 30-11-2009 which was accepted under assessment passed u/s. 143(3) of the Act, wherein, the claim of the assessee seeking 50% of certified export profits were allowed. The said assessment was quashed by the CIT u/s. 263 of the Act, which in turn the ITAT quashed the order of CIT passed u/s. 263 of the Act. Therefore, the original assessment made by the AO u/s. 143(3) of the Act was restored and the claim of assessee at 50% of certified export profits remained as such. The assessee has agitated the claim of 100% of certified export profits before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) considering the ITAT order, wherein, the original order of AO was restored, denied the claim of assessee in allowing 100% certified export profits. On perusal of the impugned order, we find no force in the arguments of ld. AR in seeking 100% certified export profits as there was no such claim in the original assessment order passed u/s. 143(3) of the Act which is evident from para 6.3 of the impugned order, therefore, we find no infirmity in the order of CIT(A) and the grounds raised by the assessee fails and are dismissed.
In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 20th September, 2023.