BIHAR COMBINED ENTRANCE COMPETITIVE EXAMINATION BOARD,PATNA vs. ACIT(EXEMPTIONS CIRCLE), PATNA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 26/PAT/2018Status: HeardITAT Patna13 June 2022AY 2009-104 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that since the assessee's application for exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) was subsequently allowed by the CIT(Exemption) for the relevant assessment years, the income stands exempted. Consequently, any disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) would not create any tax liability.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a board constituted for conducting entrance examinations, claimed exemption under Section 10(23C) but was denied by the AO. The AO also disallowed payments to a printer for non-deduction of TDS.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee is entitled to exemption under Section 10(23C) and the impact of subsequent allowance of exemption on disallowances made under Section 40(a)(ia).

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 10(23C)(vi),Section 40(a)(ia)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘PATNA’ BENCH, KOLKATA

Heard together (2 matters)

ITA Nos. 25/PAT/2018
ITA Nos. 26/PAT/2018

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:- These two appeals filed by the assessee are directed against two separate orders both dated 27.11.2017 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Patna for A.Ys. 2014-15 and 2009-10 and since identical issues are involved therein, the same have been heard together and are being disposed of by a single consolidated order for the sake of convenience.

A.Y. 2014-2015 & Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Board, Patna

2.

Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Board constituted under the Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Act, 1995 to provide for combined competitive examination for entrance in Graduate Level Vocational Courses of the Universities, Colleges, Institutions in the State. The examinations conducted by the assessee are for admission to Graduate and Post-Graduate Courses of different faculties of Medical, Engineering and Polytechnic Courses etc. The assessee has filed its return showing a total income at Rs. ‘NIL’ against which the assessment has been completed at a total income of Rs.8,64,28,996/-. In making the assessment, the ld. Assessing Officer brought to tax the surplus of income over expenditure as shown in the Income and Expenditure Account. The assessee in its return has claimed exemption in respect of its total income under section 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act on the grounds that it is constituted and substantially financed by the Government. The assessee also claimed exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act. The claim of exemption has, however, been disallowed on the ground inter alia that the assessee is not wholly and substantially financed by the Government and is also not involved in educational activities. The ld. Assessing Officer also disallowed payments made to printer amounting to Rs.2,85,85,395/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter called the ‘Act”). The disallowances of payments to printer for printing of examination question papers has been made on the ground that the assessee has filed to deduct tax at source on payment made for printing of examination question papers. The ld. Assessing Officer also mentions that there is no provision in the Act, which permit allowance of expenditure in certain contingent circumstances where tax at source is not deducted. A.Y. 2014-2015 & Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Board, Patna

3.

Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order of the ld. Assessing Officer, the assessee preferred appeals before the ld. CIT(Appeals), however, remained unsuccessful.

4.

Being aggrieved, the assessee has come in appeals before us.

5.

At the outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee has brought to our attention that the assessee earlier had filed separate applications for exemption under section 10(23C) of the Income Tax Act, which were rejected by the ld. CIT(Exemption). The assessee preferred appeal against the said orders before the Hon’ble High Court, whereupon the Hon’ble High Court vide its order dated 03.12.2020 remanded the matter back to the ld. CIT(Exemption) for consideration afresh. The ld. counsel for the assessee has further brought to our attention to the order dated 30.03.2021 of the ld. CIT(Exemption), whereby, the application of the assessee for grant of exemption under section 10(23C(vi) has been allowed for assessment year 2004-05 to assessment year 2010-11. Ld. Counsel has further brought to our attention to the order dated 27.03.2022 of ld. CIT(Exemption), whereby, the ld. CIT(Exemption) following the direction of the Hon’ble High Court has granted exemption to the assessee under section 10(23C)(vi) for the assessment year 2014- 15 also i.e. for the assessment year under consideration. Since the application of the assessee for exemption under section 10(23C)(vi) has already been allowed, therefore, the assessee is entitled to exemption under section 10(23C)(vi) and, therefore, the income of the assessee stands exempted.

6.

So far as the disallowance made by the ld. Assessing Officer under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act is concerned, it is noted that since the income of the assessee is exempt under section 10(23C)(vi), A.Y. 2014-2015 & Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Board, Patna therefore, any disallowance made under section 40(a)(ia) by the ld. Assessing Officer will only add to the income of the assessee, which otherwise is exempt under section 10(23C) as stated above. Therefore, the disallowance made by the ld. Assessing Officer will not create any tax liability of the assessee. In view of this, the impugned order of the ld. CIT(Appeals) is set aside and the additions made by the lower authorities are deleted.

7.

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed. Order pronounced in the open Court on June 13, 2022.

More judgments on Section 10(23C)(vi)

All 517 judgments and leading authorities on Section 10(23C)(vi) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →