DILLIP KUMAR KHATAI,BHUBANESWAR vs. PR. CIT (CENTAL), VISHAKHAPATNAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the request of the assessee's counsel to withdraw all the appeals. The learned CIT (DR) did not object to this request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed multiple appeals against orders passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT) under Section 263 of the Act for various assessment years. The appeals were filed by Dillip Kumar Khatai (Individual) and Dillip Kumar Khatai (HUF).
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals filed against the Pr. CIT's orders. The appeals were withdrawn by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
Before: ARUN KHODPIA & ARUN KHODPIA & ARUN KHODPIA
Heard together (7 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
O R D E R Per C.M.Garg g, JM These are appeals filed by the assessee(s) against the separate These are appeals filed by the assessee(s) against the separate These are appeals filed by the assessee(s) against the separate orders U/S.263 of the Act of the Pr. CIT (Central) , orders U/S.263 of the Act of the Pr. CIT (Central) , orders U/S.263 of the Act of the Pr. CIT (Central) , Vishakhapatnam i.e. dated 11.3.2021 for the assessment year 2010 dated 11.3.2021 for the assessment year 2010-2011 and dated 15.3.2021 2011 and dated 15.3.2021 for the assessment years 2012 for the assessment years 2012-13 to 2016-17 in the case of Dillip Kumar 17 in the case of Dillip Kumar
P a g e 1 | 2
Dillip Kumar Khatai Khatai (Individual) and order dated 15.3.2021 for the assessment year 2010-2011 in the case of Dillip Kumar Khatai (HUF)
At the time of hearing, ld counsel for the assessee sought to withdraw all the appeals filed before the Tribunal, to which, ld CIT DR did not have any objection.
In view of above, we accede to the request of ld A.R. of the assessee and permit to withdraw the appeals.
In the result, appeals of the assessee’s(s) are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 28 /3/2022.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026