ORISSA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION,BHUBANESWAR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee was not granted a substantive opportunity to provide information due to the pandemic. Therefore, the CIT(E)'s order was set aside and the issue was restored for readjudication with adequate opportunity for the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee's application for registration under Section 12AA was rejected by the CIT(E) for not providing requested information. The assessee argued that the pandemic hindered their ability to furnish the details and that they were not granted adequate opportunity.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was granted adequate opportunity to furnish information before the CIT(E) for registration under Section 12AA, especially considering the pandemic situation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA
यनधाजररती की ओर से /Assessee by : Shri Dilip Kumar Mohanty, AR राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by : None (Adjournment Application filed by CIT-DR) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 02/05/2022 घोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 02/05/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(E), Hyderabad refusing to grant the assessee registration u/s.12AA of the Act.
The ld. CIT-DR appearing for the revenue has sought adjournment in this case. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments of the ld. AR, the Bench proceeded to decide the appeal after rejecting the adjournment application of the department as the same is unsupported by any valid reasons.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026