M/S. HARIHAR INFRASTUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,NAGPUR vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE- 1, NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee had purchased and held the agricultural lands as an investment, not as stock-in-trade, as no development activities were carried out. Therefore, the gains from the sale were not to be treated as business income.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a real estate developer, sold agricultural lands and claimed the gains as exempt. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated the gains as business income, arguing the assessee held the lands as stock-in-trade. The CIT(Appeals) confirmed the AO's order.
What were the issues?
Whether the gain on sale of agricultural land held by a real estate developer is to be treated as business income or capital gains, and if it qualifies for exemption.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI RAVISH SOOD & SHRI JAMLAPPA D BATTULL
आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant. 1. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 2. 3. The CIT(Appeals)-1, Nagpur. 4. The CIT-II, Nagpur. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, 5. नागपुर/ DR, ITAT, Nagpur. गाड� फ़ाइल / Guard File. 6. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, // True Copy // �नजी स�चव / Private Secretary आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, रायपुर / ITAT, Raipur.
30 M/s. Harihar Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle-1, Nagpur
Date 1 Draft dictated on 26.04.2021 Sr.PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 30.04.2021 Sr.PS/PS 3 Draft proposed and placed JM/AM before the second Member 4 Draft discussed/approved AM/JM by second Member 5 Approved draft comes to Sr.PS/PS the Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of order Sr.PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr.PS/PS 9 Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R 11 Date of dispatch of order
More judgments on Section 2(14)
- Karan Dilipkumar Patel L/H of Late… vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Vapi…ITA 353/SRT/2024[2011-12]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Jagdishbhai Vasharambhai Italiya, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-3(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 150/AHD/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ishvarbhai Bhagabhai Patel, Surat vs The ACIT, Circle-2(1)(1), SuratITA 6/SRT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Malini Satish Parekh, Surat vs ITO, Ward 2(3), SuratITA 900/SRT/2024[2013-14]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Lakhmanbhai Maru, Vadodara vs ITO, Ward 1(2)(1), Vadodara, Aayakar…ITA 1046/AHD/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026