SHRI JAYESH JAYANTILAL SHAH,RAJKOT vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3), RAJKOT

PDF · subscribers
ITA 347/RJT/2017Status: HeardITAT Rajkot20 June 2022AY 2013-142 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal considered the assessee's submission for withdrawal under the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme'. Based on the submitted Form No. 5, indicating final settlement of tax arrears, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. During the hearing, the assessee did not appear but submitted an application to withdraw the appeal. This withdrawal was based on availing benefits under the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020'.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee's appeal can be withdrawn due to opting for the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' and obtaining a settlement order.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 5(2),Section 6

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT

Before: SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD & SHRI WASEEM AHMED

Hearing: 15/06/2022Pronounced: 20/06/2022

PER MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-2, Rajkot dated 19.07.2017 passed for Assessment Year 2013-14.

2.

At the time of hearing before us, none appeared on behalf the assessee. However, vide application dated 09.06.2022, the assessee submitted that the assessee has opted to avail the benefits of “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020” and also submitted that the assessee has already received Form No.5, being the order for full and final settlement of tax arrears under the said Scheme, issued by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajkot-1 in this regard, which is placed on record.

3.

The learned Departmental Representative submitted that he has no objection to the withdrawal of the appeal in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee.

Shri Jayesh Jayantilal Shah Vs. ACIT AY 2013-14 - 2 -

4.

We have considered the submission of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal under the Scheme “Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas 2020”. In the light of aforesaid request made by the assessee as also considering the Form No.5 submitted by the assessee towards the final settlement of tax arrears under Section 5(2) read with Section 6 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (Form-5) issued by the PCIT, Rajkot-1, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event, the assessee fail to avail the benefit of “Vivad se Vishwas Scheme” for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for hearing before the ITAT in accordance with law.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in the Court on 20th June, 2022 at Ahmedabad.

More judgments on Section 5(2)

All 430 judgments and leading authorities on Section 5(2) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →