M/S. ORISSAN MINING CORPORATION LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-2(1), BHUBANESWAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the addition made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A). The decision was based on the reasoning provided in a prior appeal for assessment year 2013-2014.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the CIT(A)'s order confirming the AO's action of treating the sale of old stock of Gandhamardan Block-A as undisclosed sales. The issue was identical to a previous assessment year's appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the sale of old stock of Gandhamardan Block-A can be treated as undisclosed sales.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA
Shri Siddharth Ranjan, CA for the assessee Shri M.K.Gautam, CIT-DR for the Revenue Date of Hearing : 21/06/2022 Date of Pronouncement : 21/06/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, dated 16.08.2019 passed in I.T.Appeal No.0472/17-18 for the assessment year 2016-2017.
The only issue in this appeal is against the action of the ld. CIT(A) in confirming the action of the AO treating the sale of old stock of Gandhamardan Block-A as undisclosed sales.
The issue is identical to the issue as decided for A.Y.2013-2014 in ITA No.37/CTK/2019. The facts remain the same, only the figures
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026