ITO, WARD-4, BHILWARA vs. M/S. GEMINI INFRAPROJECTS PVT. LTD., BHILWARA
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the tax effect of the deleted additions was below Rs. 20 lacs. Therefore, in accordance with CBDT Circular No. 3/2018, the appeal was dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which deleted an addition of Rs. 45,00,000/- made on account of bogus share application money. The assessee did not appear before the tribunal.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed due to low tax effect as per CBDT circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH (SMC
Before: SHRI R.C. SHARMA
PER: R.C. SHARMA, AM
This is an appeal filed by the revenue against the order of the
CIT(A), Ajmer dated 05/03/2018 for the A.Y. 2010-11 in the matter
of order u/s 143(3)/147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter
referred to as ‘the Act’, for short]. The grounds raised by the
revenue in appeal are reproduced as under:
“1. Deleting addition of Rs. 45,00,000/- on account of bogus Share Application money received from various paper companies for which specific information was received from the Investigation Wing, without appreciating the facts of the case; 2. The appellant craves to add, amend, alter, delete or modify the above grounds of appeal before or at the time of hearing”.
I have gone through the orders of authorities below and found that tax
effect in respect of additions deleted by CIT(A) is below Rs. 20 lacs, accordingly
in term of CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 this appeal deserves to be
dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 19/07/2018.
Sd/- [R.C. SHARMA] Accountant Member Dated : 19/07/2018 A/N Copy to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT 4. The CIT(A) 5. The DR 6. Guard File (ITA No. 286/Jodh/2018) Assistant Registrar Jodhpur Bench
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026