ACIT, CIRCLE-3, JODHPUR vs. M/S. S.S. ALOE PVT. LIMITED, JODHPUR
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal. This was based on the CBDT Circular No. 3/2018, which mandates dismissal of appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 20 lacs.
What were the facts?
The revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions made on account of disallowance of depreciation and power expenses. The additions deleted by the CIT(A) had a tax effect below Rs. 20 lacs.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the revenue should be dismissed due to low tax effect as per CBDT circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH (SMC
Before: SHRI R.C. SHARMA
PER: R.C. SHARMA, AM
This is an appeal filed by the revenue against the order of
the CIT(A)-2, Jodhpur dated 28/03/2018 for the A.Y. 2013-14 in
the matter of order u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
[hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’, for short]. The grounds
raised by the revenue in appeal are reproduced as under:
“1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A)- 2, Jodhpur was justified in deleting addition of Rs. 35,82,233/- made on account of disallowance of depreciation, ignoring the fact that the
2 ITA 158/Jodh/2018 ACIT, Jodhpur Vs. M/s S. S. Aloe Pvt. Ltd, Jodhpur depreciation claimed on plant and machinery were not put to use during the year and factory has not been running from last 6-7 years.
Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A)- 2, Jodhpur was justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 4,67,596/- made on account of disallowance of power expenses, ignoring the fact that during the assessment proceedings assessee fails to prove that power and fuel expenses actually pertains to M/s S. S. Aloe Pvt. Ltd., Jodhpur
That the appellant reserves its right to add, amend or alter the ground(s) of appeal on or before the date of finally heard.”
I have gone through the orders of authorities below and found that tax
effect in respect of additions deleted by CIT(A) is below Rs. 20 lacs,
accordingly in term of CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 this
appeal deserves to be dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 18/07/2018.
Sd/- [R.C. SHARMA] Accountant Member Dated : 18/07/2018 *Ganesh Kumar Copy to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT 4. The CIT(A) 5. The DR 6. Guard File (ITA No. 158/Jodh/2018)
Assistant Registrar Jodhpur Bench
3 ITA 158/Jodh/2018 ACIT, Jodhpur Vs. M/s S. S. Aloe Pvt. Ltd, Jodhpur
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026