M/S SIGMA CARTONS (P) LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT, CC-II, LUDHIANA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal, following established legal principles and case law, decided that the appeals were not being prosecuted. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed without delving into the merits of the case.
What were the facts?
The assessees' appeals were listed for hearing, but no one appeared on their behalf despite proper service of notice. The tribunal noted the assessees' lack of interest in pursuing the appeals.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the non-appearance of the assessees and their failure to prosecute the appeals, leading to a dismissal for non-prosecution.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.2,267 citing38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
- Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar v. CWT2,040 citing223 ITR 480 · 1997 · HC
- CIT v. B.N. Bhattacharya & Another1,656 citing118 ITR 461 · 1997 · SC
- New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT351 citing296 ITR 495 · 2008 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH BENCHES, ‘B’ CHANDIGARH
Before: SHRI SANJAY GARG & Ms. ANNAPURNA GUPTA
Per Bench:
The captioned appeals have been preferred by the assessees against the separate orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Ludhiana [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’], Ludhiana
dated 29.06.2017 (in ITA 1251/Chd/2017) and 16.06.2017 (in ITA Nos. 1252 & 1253/Chd/2017).
ITA Nos. 1251 to 1253/Chd/2017- M/s Saber Packaging (P) Ltd & Sigma Cartons (P) Ltd Ludhiana 2
No one has come for appearance on behalf of the assessees despite
service of notice. It appears
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026