RATNAM JUTE PVT.LTD,RAJAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, SRIKAKULAM
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal corrected a mention of the assessment year in its previous order. The appeals for both assessment years were allowed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals for Assessment Years 2012-13 and 2013-14. A corrigendum was issued to correct a typographical error in the original order.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was a correction of a factual error in the Tribunal's prior judgment regarding the assessment year.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM “SMC” BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, HON’BLE
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. ननधधाऩरती/ The Assessee– M/s Ratnam Jute (P) Ltd., D.No.2-1, Palakonda Road,Rajam, Srikakulam 2. रधजस्व/The Revenue – The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Income Tax Office, Palakonda Road, Srikakulam 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Visakhapatnam 4. DR,ITAT, नवभधगीय प्रनतनननध, आयकर अपीलीय अनधकरण, नवशधखधपटणम / Visakhapatnam 5..गधर्ा फ़धईल / Guard file
आदेशधनुसधर / BY ORDER
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Visakhapatnam
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026