INTERNATIONAL GREEN SCAPES LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE 74(1), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that while Section 194I was not applicable to EDC payments, Section 194C was indeed applicable. The AO was directed to modify his order to apply Section 194C.
What were the facts?
The assessee company paid External Development Charges (EDC) to HUDA. The Assessing Officer (AO) initially treated these payments as 'rent' and levied demand under Section 201(1)/201(1A) by invoking Section 194I. The CIT(TDS) found the AO's order erroneous and prejudicial to revenue, directing a fresh order considering Section 194C.
What were the issues?
Whether EDC payments to HUDA are subject to TDS under Section 194I or Section 194C of the Income Tax Act, and the validity of the CIT(TDS) revision order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 194I,Section 194C,Section 201(1),Section 201(1A),Section 263
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- M/s Puri Construction Private Limited v. Addl. CIT & Ors.42 citing159 Taxmann.com 444 · 2024 · HC
- M/s DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. v. JCIT(OSD)3 citing149 Taxmann.com 176 · 2023 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, C: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY & SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
PER BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, AM,
These two appeals have been preferred by the same assessee against the different orders dated 20.03.2024 and 26.03.2024 of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), ADDL/JCIT-4, Kolkata, u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Ac
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 194I
- Jayamma, Shivamogga vs Income Tax Officer Ward 1, ShivamoggaITA 1268/BANG/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Jayamma, Shivamogga vs Income Tax Officer Ward 1, ShivamoggaITA 1267/BANG/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- S H Donut Empire India Private Limited… vs Addl/JCIT (A), PanajiITA 2306/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Income Tax Officer- 15(1)(1), Mumbai vs Glentrans Shipping & Logistics (I) Private…ITA 9299/MUM/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Mani Square Limited, Kolkata vs Additional CIT, Range 2 (TDS), KolkataITA 1719/KOL/2026[2010-2011]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2010-2011
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026