SHRIMATI REETU NIHLANI,BHATAPARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, BHATAPARA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 17/RPR/2019Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 February 2023AY 2015-16Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD (Judicial Member), SHRI G D PADMAHSHALI (Accountant Member)3 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had filed an application under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme and the designated authority had issued Form 5. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(Appeal) order. The assessee later filed an application under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, to settle the appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal can be withdrawn due to settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR

Before: SHRI RAVISH SOOD & SHRI G D PADMAHSHALI

For Appellant: Shri R.B Doshi, CA
For Respondent: Shri Piyush Tripathi, Sr. DR
Hearing: 23.02.2023Pronounced: 23.02.2023

आदेश / ORDER

PER RAVISH SOOD, JM:

1.

The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(Appeal)-1, Raipur dated 05.09.2018, which in turn arises from the order passed by the A.O under Sec. 143(3) of the Income- tax Act, 1961, dated 19.12.2017 for assessment year 2015-16.

2.

The assessee has filed a letter dated 20.02.2023, wherein it is stated that in order to settle the aforesaid appeal pending before the Tribunal an application has been filed under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020. During the course of hearing of the appeal, it was stated by the Ld. Authorized Representative (in short ‘AR') for the assessee that “Form 5” have been issued by the designated authority. Backed by the aforesaid facts it is requested that the captioned appeal may be allowed to be withdrawn.

3.

The ld. D.R did not controvert the aforesaid factual position as had been stated before us.

4.

In view of the above we dismiss the appeal as withdrawn, subject to a rider that in the unlikely event of the matter not being resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme, then, the appellant shall have liberty to approach the Tribunal for restoration of its appeal.

3 Smt. Reetu Nihlani Vs. ITO, Bhatapara

5.

Resultantly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn subject to the observation recorded hereinabove.

Order pronounced in open Court on 23rd day of February, 2023.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →