DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. BENNETT WILLIAMSON ENGINEERS LTD., NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order, finding that the assessment orders were vitiated due to the AO's failure to record proper satisfaction for initiating proceedings under Section 153C and for not issuing a draft assessment order as required by Section 144C.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) heard appeals concerning assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12. The Assessing Officer (AO) initiated proceedings under Section 153C and made additions, treating the assessee company as a resident in India or liable for tax under Section 9(1).
What were the issues?
Whether the initiation of proceedings under Section 153C was lawful and whether the AO complied with the mandatory requirement of issuing a draft assessment order under Section 144C.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Vijay Television (P.) Ltd. v. DRP140 citing369 ITR 113 · 2014 · HC
- ESPN Star Sports Mauritius S.N.C. ET Compagnie v. Union of India71 citing388 ITR 383 · 2016 · HC
- Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 v. Sumitomo Corporation India (P) Ltd.11 citing2024 SCC OnLine DEL 6125 · 2024 · Read judgment
Heard together (4 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI (DELHI BENCH ‘D’ NEW DELHI) Circle-19, C/o Sandeep Chilana, Adv. Room No. 362, ARA Chilana & Chilana Law Offices, Centre, E-2, Advocate for the respondent, C-56, Jhandewalan LGF, Jangpura Extension, Extension, New Delhi-110014 New Delhi PAN: AAFCB9088F Appellant Respondent
C.O No. 391/Del/2015 (in ITA No. 4056/Del/2015) C.O No. 32/Del/2016 (in ITA No. 4055/Del/2015) Bennett Williamson Engineers Ltd. Vs DCIT, Central Circle- C/o Sandeep Chilana, Adv. 19, Room No. 362, Chilana & Chilana Law Offices, ARA Centre, E-2, Advocate for the respondent, C-56, Jhandewalan LGF, Jangpura Extension, Extension, New Delhi New Delhi-110014 PAN: AAFCB9088F Appellant Respondent
Assessee by Sh. Amit Goel, CA, Sh. Pranav Yadav, Adv, , Sh. Mohit Jain, CA, Sh. Sandeep Chilana, Adv & Ms. Anjali Jain, Adv.
Revenue by Sh. M. S. Nethrapal, CIT, DR
Date of Hearing 20/08/2025 Date of Pronouncement 19/09/2025 CO Nos. 391/Del/2015 & 32/Del/2016 OR
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026