SH. MARTIN EKKA S/O SH. LALSAY EKKA,PANCHKULA vs. ITO, WARD -1, PANCHKULA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the compensation received by the assessee on voluntary retirement is eligible for exemption under Section 10(10B) of the Act. The Assessing Officer was directed to allow necessary relief.
What were the facts?
The assessee received compensation on voluntary retirement, which was initially offered as taxable income. Subsequently, the assessee claimed exemption under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act, but the appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed due to a significant delay.
What were the issues?
Whether the compensation received on voluntary retirement is exempt under Section 10(10B) and whether relief under Section 89 is admissible.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Wipro Finance Ltd. v. CIT29 citing443 ITR 250 · 2022 · SC · Read judgment
- 79 Taxmann.com 2986 citing79 Taxmann.com 298 · 2017 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH
Before: SH. SANJAY GARG
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 30.03.2023 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) NFAC, Delhi pertaining to 2017-18 assessment year. The assessee in this appeal has taken following grounds of appeal :
That on the facts and circumstances of the case the order passed by the learned National Faceless CIT(A) is bad both in the eyes of law and on facts.
The learned CIT(A) erred in dismissing appeal that there was no genuine reason of condonation
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(10B)
- Indrani Chatterjee, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 52(1), KolkataITA 2871/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- Tapan Mandal, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 52(1), KolkataITA 2870/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- Saroj Kumar Haldar, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 52(1), KolkataITA 2869/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- Saroj Kumar Haldar, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 52(1), KolkataITA 2868/KOL/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2020-2021
- Sarmistha Dey, Hooghly, West Bengal vs Income Tax Officer Ward 24(1), Hoogly…ITA 2864/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026