MAHARAJA AGGRASEN WELFARE TRUST,PANCHKULA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the CIT(E)'s order. The assessee was granted liberty to file a fresh application for registration under Section 80G by June 30, 2024, which the CIT(E) was directed to examine on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, applied for registration under Section 80G. The application was rejected by the CIT(E) solely because it was filed beyond the prescribed time limit.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of an application for Section 80G registration solely on the grounds of being time-barred is sustainable, especially in light of a subsequent CBDT circular extending the time limit.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च�ीगढ़ �ायपीठ “बी” , च�ीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “B”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: HYBRID MODE �ी आकाश दीप जैन, उपा�� एवं �ी िव�म िसंह यादव, लेखा सद� BEFORE: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN, VP & SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM आयकर अपील सं./ िनधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year : 2023-24 Maharaja Aggrasen Welfare Trust, The CIT(E) बनाम House No. 222, Sector 7, Panchkula Chandigarh Haryana �ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AADAM4003B अपीलाथ�/Appellant ��थ�/Respondent िनधा�रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Nikhil Goyal, Advocate & Smt. Ashisha Mittal, C.A राज� की ओर से/ Revenue by : Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT D.R सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 24/05/2024 उदघोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 28/05/2024 आदेश/Order PER VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. :
This is an appeal filed by the assessee society against the order of the Ld. CIT(E), Chandigarh dt. 26/03/2024 rejecting it’s application seeking registration under Section 80G of the Act.
Briefly the facts of the case are that the assessee is a registered public charitable society formed on 13-Jan-2009 and is engaged in providing free and/or subsidized education to students from under privileged backgrounds, providing medicines and other financial help to people in need. The assessee society had moved an application for provisional registration which was allowed on 01-Dec-2022. Thereafter, the assessee society moved an application in Form 10AB for seeking registration under Section 80(G)(5)(iii) on 20-Sep- 2023.
The application so filed by the assessee society was rejected for the reason that Form 10AB was filed beyond time limits prescribed under Clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act and various other circulars issued by the Department from time to time and without going into the merits of the application.
Being aggrieved, the assessee society has filed the present appeal before us. 5. During the course of hearing, Ld. AR submitted that as per the latest Circular issued by the Central Board Direct Taxes (Circular no. 07/2024, dated 25-Apr-2024), an extended time limit has now been granted to all charitable trusts and societies to file fresh application in Form 10AB until 30-Jun-2024 and relevant paragraph 4.1 of the said circular reads as under: "Further, in cases where any trust, institution or fund has already made an application in Form No. 10AB. and where the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner has passed an order rejecting such application, on or before the issuance of this Circular, solely on account of the fact that the application was furnished after the due date or that the application has been furnished under the wrong section code, it may furnish afresh application in Form No. 10AB within the extended time provided in paragraph 3(H) i.e. 30.06.2024.” 6. It was submitted by the ld AR that the case of the assessee society is covered by the scenarios envisaged in aforesaid para 4.1 of the CBDT Circular as the application seeking registration under Section 80G has been rejected for the sole reason that the application has been filed after the due date. It was accordingly submitted that in light of the aforesaid CBDT Circular, the order rejecting application of the assessee for registration under section 80G may kindly be quashed and the assessee society be granted liberty to file fresh application seeking registration under Section 80G and the matter thus be restored to the file of the ld CIT(E) to be adjudicated on merits after allowing necessary opportunity to the assessee society.
In her submissions, the ld CIT/DR didn’t raise any specific objection whether the liberty is granted to the assessee society in terms of moving the fresh application seeking registration under Section 80G in light of aforesaid CBDT Circular.
Having heard both the parties and considering the material available on record. Admittedly the application seeking registration under Section 80G has been dismissed in limine by the ld CIT(E) as barred by limitation without going into the merits of the case. The CBDT in its Circular no. 07/2024 dated 25-Apr-2024 has provided that representations have been received and on consideration of difficulties and with a view to avoid and mitigate genuine hardship, the due dates has been extended further. It has been further provided that where the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner has passed an order rejecting such application, on or before the issuance of the Circular, solely on account of the fact that the application was furnished after the due date or that the application has been furnished under the wrong section code, it may furnish afresh application in Form No. 10AB within the extended time provided in paragraph 3(H) i.e. 30/06/2024.
In light of the same, we hereby grant liberty to the assessee society to file fresh application seeking registration under Section 80G before the ld CIT(E) and where such an application is filed on or before 30/06/2024, the ld CIT(E) to examine the same on merits as per law after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. The impugned order so passed by the ld CIT(E) is accordingly quashed and the matter set- aside to the file of the ld CIT(E) for adjudication of fresh application.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026