MS KANIKA BUILDCON PVT LTD,PATNA vs. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 and the Competent Authority had issued Form 5. Consequently, the Bench allowed the assessee to withdraw its appeals.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals for AYs 2010-11 and 2011-12. At the time of hearing, neither the assessee nor their representative appeared. The assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 scheme.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's non-appearance and their subsequent opting for the Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA BENCH
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, HON’BLE(KZ) & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, HON’BLE
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेश खुले �यायपीठ म� �दनांक…20-09-2022 को उ�घो�षत। Order pronounced in the open court
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026