SHRI TUSHARBHAI VIRJIBHAI PAMBHAR,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-3 (1) (1), RAJKOT

PDF · subscribers
ITA 273/RJT/2019Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot16 September 2022AY 2013-142 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had obtained a certificate under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Since the Revenue had no objection, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against a penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. During the hearing, it was noted that the assessee intended to resolve the issue through the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 271(1)(c)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT

Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED, & SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL

For Appellant: Shri Chetan Agarwal, A.R
Hearing: 06/07/2022Pronounced: 16/09/2022

आदेश/O R D E R PER BENCH:

1.

The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals), Jamnagar, dated 22/08/2019 arising in the matter of penalty order passed under s.271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (here-in-after referred to as "the Act") relevant to the Assessment Year 2013-14.

2.

When the matter was called for hearing, it was noticed that the assessee wants to resolve the issue with the department by availing benefit under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, and therefore the appeal of the Assessee required to be withdrawn in terms of scheme. The assessee has filed copy of form number 5 being the certificate issue under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The Ld. DR had no objection if the appeal of the Assessee is treated to be withdrawn in terms of the scheme opted by the assessee.

3.

In the light of the above submission made by the assessee, we find no reason to keep the appeal pending of the Assessee before the Tribunal. Accordingly the appeal of the Assessee stands dismissed. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of VSV Scheme for any bonafide reason, then the assessee will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for adjudication before the ITAT in accordance with law.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is dismissed under VSV Scheme.

Order pronounced in the Court on 16/09/2022 at Ahmedabad.

More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)

All 25,141 judgments and leading authorities on Section 271(1)(c) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →