DCIT, BHUBANESWAR vs. SERAJUDDIN & CO., KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 368/CTK/2015Status: HeardITAT Cuttack30 September 2022AY 2011-1220 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions related to suppressed production and compensatory afforestation fund, finding the difference negligible and the expenditure revenue in nature. The deletion of additions for late EPF payment was also upheld based on prospective amendment of relevant sections. However, the disallowance of ad-hoc travelling and conveyance expenses was deleted.

What were the facts?

The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions made on grounds of suppressed production, compensatory afforestation fund, late EPF payment, and suppressed liability. The Assessee also filed cross objections which were withdrawn. The Tribunal considered various grounds of appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) was justified in deleting additions made by the AO on various grounds, including suppression of production, nature of afforestation expenses, and late payment of EPF. Also, whether ad-hoc disallowances on travel expenses are permissible.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 36(1)(va),Section 43B,Section 132(9A),Section 153A,Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK

Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA

Hearing: 30/09/2022Pronounced: 30/09/2022

Heard together (2 matters)

ITA No.368/CTK/2015
ITA No.161/CTK/2015

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

आदेश की प्रनिलऱपप अग्रेपषि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अऩीऱाथी / The Appellant- 1.

प्रत्यथी / The Respondent- 2.

More judgments on Section 36(1)(va)

All 6,054 judgments and leading authorities on Section 36(1)(va) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →